Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
CLARIV Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50 PA++++ makes strong protection claims, but its lack of ingredient transparency and inconsistent pricing make it difficult for consumers to make an informed choice.
₹320 • Analysed 22 October 2026
The CLARIV Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50 PA++++ positions itself strongly for the Indian consumer, addressing common concerns like white cast and greasiness in humid climates. However, the brand's claim of 'affordable pricing' is contradicted by significantly higher prices found on Flipkart. The 'non-toxic' claim raises an ASCI concern due to its absolute and vague nature. Crucially, the absence of a publicly available full INCI list makes it impossible to verify key claims like 'fragrance-free' and 'non-comedogenic', which are vital for Indian consumers prone to hyperpigmentation and acne.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to analyse, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence analysis, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of analysis.
SPF/PA claims require ISO 24444/24443 testing on the finished product. No such reports are publicly visible for this product.
Subjective claim, no comparative data against other sunscreens is publicly visible.
Aspirational claim, no specific finished product evidence for these endpoints is publicly visible.
Mineral sunscreens are generally considered gentle, but 'powerful' is subjective and lacks specific product evidence.
This describes the known mechanism of mineral UV filters (Zinc Oxide, Titanium Dioxide).
Mineral filters (Zinc Oxide, Titanium Dioxide) are known to provide broad-spectrum protection.
PA++++ is the highest UVA rating, but requires specific testing (ISO 24443) which is not publicly visible for this product.
Achieving truly no white cast with SPF 50 mineral sunscreen, especially on Indian skin tones, is a formulation challenge. No specific finished product evidence or user studies are publicly visible to support this.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI)
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance assessment.
“Non-toxic”
Absolute and vague claim that is difficult to substantiate scientifically and can be misleading.
SPF/PA claims require ISO 24444/24443 testing on the finished product. No such reports are publicly visible for this product.
Missing
Subjective claim, no comparative data against other sunscreens is publicly visible.
Missing
Aspirational claim, no specific finished product evidence for these endpoints is publicly visible.
Missing
Mineral sunscreens are generally considered gentle, but 'powerful' is subjective and lacks specific product evidence.
Mentioned only
This describes the known mechanism of mineral UV filters (Zinc Oxide, Titanium Dioxide).
Mentioned only
Mineral filters (Zinc Oxide, Titanium Dioxide) are known to provide broad-spectrum protection.
Mentioned only
PA++++ is the highest UVA rating, but requires specific testing (ISO 24443) which is not publicly visible for this product.
Missing
Achieving truly no white cast with SPF 50 mineral sunscreen, especially on Indian skin tones, is a formulation challenge. No specific finished product evidence or user studies are publicly visible to support this.
Missing
Subjective claim, no specific finished product evidence or user studies are publicly visible.
Missing
This is a general scientific fact about SPF 50, not a specific claim about this product's unique performance.
Mentioned only
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This analysis evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-analysis, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
