Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
Clinique's Dramatically Different Moisturizing Lotion+ is a well-formulated, clinically-backed moisturizer for barrier repair and hydration, but consumers should be aware of its premium pricing and the varying levels of claim detail across different sales platforms.
₹750 • Analysed 22 October 2026
Clinique Dramatically Different Moisturizing Lotion+ is a premium face moisturizer in the Indian market, with prices ranging from Rs.750 for 15ml to Rs.3500 for 125ml. Its rich, occlusive formula, featuring mineral oil and petrolatum, is well-suited for very dry to dry combination skin types, which can benefit from its strong barrier support, especially in varying Indian climates. The brand's claims of '100% fragrance free' and 'no parabens' align with growing consumer preference for 'clean' formulations. While some quantified claims like '54% barrier strengthening' are made on marketplaces, the brand's own site provides clinical context for other claims like '21% barrier repair in 2 hours', which is a good practice for ASCI compliance. The 'No. 1 moisturizer' claim, however, lacks publicly visible substantiation and could attract ASCI scrutiny.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to analyse, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence analysis, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of analysis.
Brand states '8-hour hydration' consistently. While no specific study details are publicly linked, the brand's extensive clinical testing for the reformulation (1,600 people across five countries) provides general finished-product support for core claims.
Supported by the product's hydrating ingredients (Glycerin, Urea, Sodium Hyaluronate) and general finished-product testing.
Brand claims 'significantly improves skin barrier repair by 21% in just 2 hours' based on 'Clinical testing on 21 women'. This is a specific, quantified clinical claim with methodology details.
Myntra states 'Helps strengthen skin's own moisture barrier by 54%'. While a specific percentage is given, the full context or study details for this exact 54% claim are not publicly linked, though the brand does claim barrier strengthening with clinical data (21% in 2 hours).
Belk states 'Instantly boosts skin's moisture by 119%'. This is a quantified claim, but specific study details (sample size, method, duration) are not fully provided beyond the percentage.
A routine claim supported by formula type and user reviews.
Clinique was founded with a dermatologist, and the product was developed with dermatologists.
A standard safety claim for Clinique, indicating internal testing protocols.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against the label.
Screened against the ingredient database (12 of 22 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
No ingredient with a recognised endocrine-activity concern found in the database.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Contains ingredient(s) commonly rated comedogenic: lanolin. May not suit very acne-prone skin.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Declares 1 known allergen(s) (CI 19140). Reactive skin should note these.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Any proprietary 'complex' is broken down into its actual ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
No retinoid or other pregnancy-cautioned active found in the screen.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Water |
Paraffinum Liquidum |
Glycerin |
Petrolatum |
Stearic Acid |
Glyceryl Stearate |
Sesamum Indicum (Sesame) Seed Oil |
Urea |
Lanolin Alcohol |
Triethanolamine |
Hordeum Vulgare (Barley) Extract/Extrait D'Orge |
Cucumis Sativus (Cucumber) Fruit Extract |
Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seedcake |
Propylene Glycol Dicaprate |
Sodium Hyaluronate |
Butylene Glycol |
Pentylene Glycol |
Trisodium EDTA |
Phenoxyethanol |
CI 15985 |
CI 19140 |
CI 17200 |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance assessment.
“Clinique's #1 face moisturizer”
Uses 'No. 1' claim without disclosed methodology or comparable study, which is an ASCI concern.
Brand states '8-hour hydration' consistently. While no specific study details are publicly linked, the brand's extensive clinical testing for the reformulation (1,600 people across five countries) provides general finished-product support for core claims.
Evidence visible
Supported by the product's hydrating ingredients (Glycerin, Urea, Sodium Hyaluronate) and general finished-product testing.
Evidence visible
Brand claims 'significantly improves skin barrier repair by 21% in just 2 hours' based on 'Clinical testing on 21 women'. This is a specific, quantified clinical claim with methodology details.
Evidence visible
Myntra states 'Helps strengthen skin's own moisture barrier by 54%'. While a specific percentage is given, the full context or study details for this exact 54% claim are not publicly linked, though the brand does claim barrier strengthening with clinical data (21% in 2 hours).
Evidence visible
Belk states 'Instantly boosts skin's moisture by 119%'. This is a quantified claim, but specific study details (sample size, method, duration) are not fully provided beyond the percentage.
Evidence visible
A routine claim supported by formula type and user reviews.
Evidence visible
Clinique was founded with a dermatologist, and the product was developed with dermatologists.
Evidence visible
A standard safety claim for Clinique, indicating internal testing protocols.
Evidence visible
The INCI list does not contain 'Parfum' or 'Fragrance'. This claim is supported.
Evidence visible
The INCI list does not contain parabens. This claim is supported.
Evidence visible
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This analysis evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-analysis, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
