Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
Foxtale's Daily Glow Sunscreen delivers on its core promise of high, in-vivo tested UV protection with a flattering glow, but should provide clearer evidence for its blue light protection claims.
The Foxtale Daily Glow Sunscreen is positioned as an affordable yet high-performance option in the Indian market, leveraging modern UV filters and popular actives like Vitamin C and Niacinamide. Its 'In-Vivo Tested' SPF 50 PA++++ rating is crucial for Indian consumers facing high UV indices and concerns about tanning and pigmentation. The price point, often discounted on quick commerce platforms, makes it accessible. While the brand's claims are largely well-supported, the 'blue light protection' claim lacks specific evidence and warrants ASCI scrutiny, especially given a third-party contradiction. The presence of 'Allergen-Free Fragrance' is a key detail for Indian consumers, many of whom prefer fragrance-free products, and a marketplace listing incorrectly stating 'fragrance-free' is a point of concern for platform parity.
The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to analyse, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence analysis, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of analysis.
This is a brand claim. TCS has not reviewed matching product-specific evidence for the claim. Its presence does not change the product rating by itself.
The brand explicitly states the product is 'In-Vivo Tested' for SPF and PA ratings, which refers to testing on human skin.
This is a brand claim. TCS has not reviewed matching product-specific evidence for the claim. Its presence does not change the product rating by itself.
This is a cosmetic claim supported by formula design (emollients, silicones) and consistent user feedback across platforms.
High SPF 50 PA++++ protection, confirmed by in-vivo testing, directly supports the prevention of tanning and darkening of marks caused by UV exposure.
Supported by the use of modern chemical UV filters and consistent positive user reviews.
Supported by formula composition (emollients like C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate, silicones like Dimethicone) and widespread positive user feedback.
The INCI lists Ethyl Ascorbic Acid, a stable derivative of Vitamin C.
The INCI lists Niacinamide.
Supported by the presence of Niacinamide and Ethyl Ascorbic Acid, which have general research for skin brightening. No finished product study for this specific brightening claim is publicly visible.
Checked against the ingredient list as declared. It is not a substitute for a full regulatory assessment.
How we read this product across five areas. Open any row for the full reasoning.
Allergen-Free Fragrance: Fragrance · A blend of fragrance components formulated to exclude common allergens, present at a low concentration.
The formula effectively combines new-generation UV filters for robust sun protection with skin-benefiting actives like Niacinamide and Ethyl Ascorbic Acid. The texture is designed to be lightweight and non-greasy, suitable for daily wear. While Niacinamide is high in the INCI, Vitamin C and E are lower, suggesting their primary role is antioxidant support rather than high-concentration treatment. The pH of 6-6.5 is appropriate for a sunscreen. The formula logic strongly supports the core SPF, no white cast, and lightweight claims.
The claim of 'blue light protection' is not supported by publicly visible evidence and is contradicted by a third-party review. The '8-hour photostable protection' claim, while plausible with modern filters, lacks detailed public study data.
Worth knowing: Allergen-Free Fragrance (for extremely sensitive individuals).
Strongest public evidence: level 6 of 7. The product offers robust SPF 50 PA++++ protection with modern, photostable UV filters, confirmed by in-vivo testing, and delivers a desirable radiant, no-white-cast finish.
SPF 50 PA++++: Claim is supported by 'In-Vivo Tested' statements across multiple brand and retailer sources, indicating a clinical study on the finished product.
In-Vivo Tested: The brand explicitly states the product is 'In-Vivo Tested' for SPF and PA ratings, which refers to testing on human skin.
Broad-spectrum UV protection: Supported by the presence of modern UVA (Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate, Tris-Biphenyl Triazine) and UVB (Ethylhexyl Triazone) filters in the INCI, and the PA++++ rating from in-vivo testing.
19 marketing claims checked. 0 ASCI concern(s), 0 drug-boundary flag(s).
Active percentages are not disclosed for Niacinamide or Ethyl Ascorbic Acid.
Daily morning, as the final step in your skincare routine before makeup.
Applies smoothly under makeup. Reapply every 2-3 hours when outdoors.
A lightweight, non-greasy feel with a radiant, no-white-cast finish.
Effective sun protection, reduced tanning, and a gradual improvement in skin radiance and even tone due to actives.
The complete ingredient list names an explicit fragrance declaration or essential oil.
No sourced pregnancy flags were found for the ingredients screened. This is not proof that the product is safe during pregnancy. Exposure category: leave-on. Ingredients not resolved: Octenidine Hcl, Disodium Phosphate, Simethicone, Ethyl Ascorbic Acid, Aminomethyl Propanol and Allergen-Free Fragrance. Ask a healthcare professional.
None is prohibited.
50ml · from Rs.149 on Amazon India (likely an outlier/combo) or Rs.300/50ml on Swiggy Instamart (Rs.6.60/ml–9.90/ml). Seen at Brand Website Rs.495, Nykaa Rs.468, Amazon India Rs.149, Flipkart Rs.375, Zepto Rs.330, Swiggy Instamart Rs.300 and Myntra Rs.375.
7 of 10 claims are publicly supported; 3 need proof.
People to take care with: You prefer a matte finish; You are extremely sensitive to any fragrance; You expect high-concentration active treatment from a sunscreen.
Analysed on 9 Nov 2026 from INKEE Decoder. We re-check analyses older than six months.
Understand what each product rating means.
Meets our review criteria
Available evidence supports the criteria assessed under The Clean Sheet Standard.
Further verification needed
Some assessment criteria require additional evidence or clarification.
Does not meet review criteria
One or more material criteria were not met based on the evidence reviewed. See assessment details.
Not yet assessed
We have not completed an assessment of this product.
Grey means we have not yet assessed this product. It does not mean the product is unsafe.
Want to read about our standard?