Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
This MAYAMIC CARE shampoo makes popular 'free-from' and 'nourishing' claims, but its complete lack of ingredient transparency leaves consumers unable to verify these claims or assess product suitability, posing a significant confusion risk.
₹549 • Analysed 22 October 2026
This MAYAMIC CARE shampoo is positioned as a nourishing and conditioning option for both men and women, specifically highlighting its 'Sulphate & Paraben Free' nature, which is a popular consumer preference in India. Priced at Rs. 549 for 200ml, it sits in the mid-to-premium segment for shampoos. However, the complete absence of an INCI list is a significant transparency gap under India Cosmetics Rules 2020, making it impossible to verify its 'free-from' claims or assess its suitability for Indian hair types and climate conditions. Without ingredient disclosure, consumers cannot make informed choices, especially regarding potential heavy ingredients that might feel heavy in humid Indian weather or the actual mildness of the 'gentle cleansing' claim.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to analyse, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence analysis, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of analysis.
This is a core functional claim for a shampoo. No specific finished product evidence is publicly visible to support the 'nourishing & conditioning' aspect beyond general product description. Formula logic cannot be assessed without INCI.
The full INCI list is not publicly visible. Therefore, this 'free-from' claim cannot be verified. If the INCI were available and did not list sulphates or parabens, the claim would be supported.
General suitability claim, typically low risk for a shampoo. No specific evidence needed beyond general cosmetic formulation practices.
Similar to the title claim, this is a functional and appearance claim. No finished product evidence is publicly visible. Without INCI, 'specially formulated' and 'deep nourishment' cannot be assessed for formula logic.
This claim targets specific hair concerns (dry, grey) and promises long-lasting moisture and shine. Without INCI to identify moisturizing agents or finished product testing, this claim is unverified and ambitious for a rinse-off product.
The 'mild formula' and 'maintaining natural moisture balance' claims are dependent on the surfactant system and other ingredients. Without INCI, this cannot be verified. General shampoo formulation can be mild, but specific claims require ingredient transparency.
A common claim for shampoos. Assumed to be true for a general cleansing product unless irritancy is noted. No specific evidence needed.
This claim is ambitious, promising restoration of natural shine and vitality for dry and dull hair. Without ingredient disclosure or finished product evidence, this claim is unverified.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Brand describes ingredient origin in its claims.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not found).
Full INCI list not available, which is a requirement for cosmetic products in India.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not found).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not found).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not found).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not found).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not found).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not found).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not found).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not found).
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance assessment.
This is a core functional claim for a shampoo. No specific finished product evidence is publicly visible to support the 'nourishing & conditioning' aspect beyond general product description. Formula logic cannot be assessed without INCI.
Missing
The full INCI list is not publicly visible. Therefore, this 'free-from' claim cannot be verified. If the INCI were available and did not list sulphates or parabens, the claim would be supported.
Missing
General suitability claim, typically low risk for a shampoo. No specific evidence needed beyond general cosmetic formulation practices.
Missing
Similar to the title claim, this is a functional and appearance claim. No finished product evidence is publicly visible. Without INCI, 'specially formulated' and 'deep nourishment' cannot be assessed for formula logic.
Missing
This claim targets specific hair concerns (dry, grey) and promises long-lasting moisture and shine. Without INCI to identify moisturizing agents or finished product testing, this claim is unverified and ambitious for a rinse-off product.
Missing
The 'mild formula' and 'maintaining natural moisture balance' claims are dependent on the surfactant system and other ingredients. Without INCI, this cannot be verified. General shampoo formulation can be mild, but specific claims require ingredient transparency.
Missing
A common claim for shampoos. Assumed to be true for a general cleansing product unless irritancy is noted. No specific evidence needed.
Missing
This claim is ambitious, promising restoration of natural shine and vitality for dry and dull hair. Without ingredient disclosure or finished product evidence, this claim is unverified.
Missing
Repetitive claim about deep nourishment and moisture balance. Without INCI, 'deep nourishment' is difficult to substantiate for a rinse-off product.
Missing
Claims to help manage unruly hair and improve manageability. This is a common conditioning benefit, but without INCI to confirm conditioning agents, it remains unverified.
Missing
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This analysis evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-analysis, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
