Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
This 'aqua peel' Rosemary conditioner makes ambitious claims for hair fall control and damage repair, but without any visible ingredient list or finished product evidence, consumers are left to rely solely on marketing, making it a high-risk purchase for specific concerns.
₹138 • Analysed 21 September 2026
This 'aqua peel' Rosemary conditioner is positioned for hair fall control and smooth hair, a common concern for Indian consumers. The product is primarily found on Flipkart, where its MRP of Rs. 499 for 250ml is often heavily discounted to Rs. 138-146, which could be perceived as good value but also indicates potential pricing theatre. Without a visible INCI list, it's challenging to assess the formula's suitability for diverse Indian hair types and climates, especially for claims like 'All Hair Types' and 'Damage Repair'. The 'Hair Fall Control' claim relies on ingredient-level evidence for rosemary, not finished product testing, which is a common gap in the Indian market.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
Rosemary extract has general published research suggesting it can stimulate hair growth and prevent hair loss. However, this is ingredient-level evidence, not finished product evidence for this specific conditioner. Without INCI, the form and concentration of rosemary cannot be verified.
This is a broad emotional claim. Without an INCI list, the 'natural' composition cannot be verified. No specific evidence for 'natural care' was found.
This is a common functional claim for conditioners. Without an INCI list, the presence of conditioning agents (e.g., silicones, fatty alcohols) cannot be verified. No finished product evidence was found.
This is a performance claim. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support this claim. Without an INCI list, the presence of strengthening ingredients cannot be verified.
Similar to 'Smooth & Soft Hair', this is a common conditioner claim. No finished product evidence was found, and INCI is unavailable.
A general functional claim for hair products. Without an INCI list, the presence of nourishing ingredients (e.g., oils, proteins) cannot be verified. No specific evidence found.
This is a performance claim. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support this claim. Without an INCI list, the presence of strengthening ingredients cannot be verified.
This is a common usage recommendation for conditioners. Without INCI, potential irritants cannot be ruled out, but for a conditioner, this is generally a low-risk claim.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Brand describes ingredient origin in its claims.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI, cannot confirm)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI, cannot confirm)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI, cannot confirm)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI, cannot confirm)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI, cannot confirm)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI, cannot confirm)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI, cannot confirm)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI, cannot confirm)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI, cannot confirm)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on lack of INCI, cannot confirm)
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
Rosemary extract has general published research suggesting it can stimulate hair growth and prevent hair loss. However, this is ingredient-level evidence, not finished product evidence for this specific conditioner. Without INCI, the form and concentration of rosemary cannot be verified.
Mentioned only
This is a broad emotional claim. Without an INCI list, the 'natural' composition cannot be verified. No specific evidence for 'natural care' was found.
Missing
This is a common functional claim for conditioners. Without an INCI list, the presence of conditioning agents (e.g., silicones, fatty alcohols) cannot be verified. No finished product evidence was found.
Missing
This is a performance claim. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support this claim. Without an INCI list, the presence of strengthening ingredients cannot be verified.
Missing
Similar to 'Smooth & Soft Hair', this is a common conditioner claim. No finished product evidence was found, and INCI is unavailable.
Missing
A general functional claim for hair products. Without an INCI list, the presence of nourishing ingredients (e.g., oils, proteins) cannot be verified. No specific evidence found.
Missing
This is a performance claim. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support this claim. Without an INCI list, the presence of strengthening ingredients cannot be verified.
Missing
This is a common usage recommendation for conditioners. Without INCI, potential irritants cannot be ruled out, but for a conditioner, this is generally a low-risk claim.
Missing
A general suitability claim. Conditioners are typically gender-neutral. No specific evidence needed beyond general formulation practices.
Missing
This is a broad suitability claim. Without an INCI list, it's impossible to assess if the formulation is truly suitable for all hair types (e.g., very oily, very dry, chemically treated). No specific evidence found.
Missing
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
