Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
This AYUNEX Avocado Conditioner makes appealing claims of softness, shine, and repair, but the complete lack of ingredient transparency and finished product evidence leaves consumers unable to verify its promises or suitability.
₹499 • Analysed 20 September 2026
The AYUNEX Avocado Conditioner is positioned as a mid-range hair care product in India, priced at Rs. 499 for 250 ml. Its claims of 'Softness, Shine & Hair Repair' are common for conditioners, and the inclusion of avocado aligns with consumer preference for natural ingredients. However, the lack of a publicly available INCI list is a significant transparency gap, making it difficult for Indian consumers to verify 'Sulphate/Paraben Free' or 'Organic' claims. The 'Medically Tested' claim, without supporting evidence, raises ASCI compliance concerns.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
This is a general benefit expected from conditioners. While avocado is known for nourishing properties, no finished product evidence is publicly visible to support these specific claims for this product.
Common conditioner benefits. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support these claims for this product.
Common conditioner benefits. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support these claims for this product.
Common conditioner benefits. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support these claims for this product.
The claim 'Dermatologically tested' implies finished product testing. While no specific report is visible, the claim itself suggests a level of testing.
No INCI list is publicly available to verify the absence of sulphates or parabens.
No certification or ingredient list is available to substantiate this claim. 'Organic' is a regulated term and requires specific proof.
This is a strong claim implying clinical trials. No details of any 'medical testing' (methodology, results, institution) are publicly visible.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Brand describes ingredient origin in its claims.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (due to lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (due to lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (due to lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (due to lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (due to lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (due to lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (due to lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (due to lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (due to lack of INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (due to lack of INCI)
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“Organic”
The claim 'Organic' without visible certification or a full ingredient list to verify organic ingredients may be considered misleading under ASCI guidelines for truthful advertising.
“Medically Tested”
The claim 'Medically Tested' is an absolute claim that requires robust clinical evidence to substantiate. Without any publicly visible study details, it is likely to be considered unsubstantiated by ASCI.
This is a general benefit expected from conditioners. While avocado is known for nourishing properties, no finished product evidence is publicly visible to support these specific claims for this product.
Missing
Common conditioner benefits. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support these claims for this product.
Missing
Common conditioner benefits. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support these claims for this product.
Missing
Common conditioner benefits. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support these claims for this product.
Missing
The claim 'Dermatologically tested' implies finished product testing. While no specific report is visible, the claim itself suggests a level of testing.
Evidence visible
No INCI list is publicly available to verify the absence of sulphates or parabens.
Missing
No certification or ingredient list is available to substantiate this claim. 'Organic' is a regulated term and requires specific proof.
Missing
This is a strong claim implying clinical trials. No details of any 'medical testing' (methodology, results, institution) are publicly visible.
Missing
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
