Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
This CAMISTA conditioner makes ambitious claims for damage repair and hair fall reduction, but its lack of ingredient transparency and visible finished-product evidence makes it difficult for consumers to assess its true efficacy and suitability.
₹219 • Analysed 20 September 2026
This CAMISTA conditioner is positioned as a damage repair solution for frizzy hair, a common concern in India's humid climate. The price point of Rs. 219 (discounted) for 200ml makes it accessible in the Indian market. However, the lack of a publicly available INCI list is a significant transparency gap under India Cosmetics Rules 2020. The claim of 'reducing hair fall by up to 90%' is a strong quantified claim that raises an ASCI concern due to the absence of visible supporting clinical data.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
Murumuru butter and pea protein are known ingredients for hair conditioning and strengthening. However, no finished product evidence is publicly visible to support the 'damage repair' claim for this specific product.
This is an ambitious appearance claim. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support this transformative effect.
Claims deep penetration and strengthening. While conditioners generally nourish, 'deep penetration' and 'strengthen each strand' require specific finished product testing to verify, which is not publicly visible.
Murumuru butter is known for its emollient properties that can help tame frizz, lock in moisture, and add shine. However, this is ingredient-level evidence, not finished product evidence for this specific conditioner.
Hydrolyzed pea protein is known to strengthen hair and improve elasticity by penetrating the hair shaft. This is ingredient-level evidence, not finished product evidence for this specific conditioner.
A common claim for repair conditioners. No specific testing for suitability on these hair types is publicly visible for this product.
Detangling and ease of styling are primary functions of most conditioners. 'Lightweight' is a subjective claim.
Without the INCI list, this claim cannot be verified. However, it is a common 'free-from' claim. If the INCI were available and these were absent, it would be supported.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Brand describes ingredient origin in its claims.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Brand makes a vegan / vegetarian claim.
Sustainability & Ethics
Brand makes a cruelty-free / PETA claim.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (INCI not available for verification)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (INCI not available for verification)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (INCI not available for verification)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (INCI not available for verification)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (INCI not available for verification)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (INCI not available for verification)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (INCI not available for verification)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (INCI not available for verification)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (INCI not available for verification)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (INCI not available for verification)
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“It works to reduce hair fall by up to 90%, boosting fullness, shine, and smoothness.”
Quantified claim ('up to 90%') without publicly visible, verifiable study methodology and results. This is an ASCI concern under Chapter 1.4 (Truthful and Honest) and 4.1 (Personal Care & Health).
Murumuru butter and pea protein are known ingredients for hair conditioning and strengthening. However, no finished product evidence is publicly visible to support the 'damage repair' claim for this specific product.
Mentioned only
This is an ambitious appearance claim. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support this transformative effect.
Missing
Claims deep penetration and strengthening. While conditioners generally nourish, 'deep penetration' and 'strengthen each strand' require specific finished product testing to verify, which is not publicly visible.
Missing
Murumuru butter is known for its emollient properties that can help tame frizz, lock in moisture, and add shine. However, this is ingredient-level evidence, not finished product evidence for this specific conditioner.
Mentioned only
Hydrolyzed pea protein is known to strengthen hair and improve elasticity by penetrating the hair shaft. This is ingredient-level evidence, not finished product evidence for this specific conditioner.
Mentioned only
A common claim for repair conditioners. No specific testing for suitability on these hair types is publicly visible for this product.
Missing
Detangling and ease of styling are primary functions of most conditioners. 'Lightweight' is a subjective claim.
Missing
Without the INCI list, this claim cannot be verified. However, it is a common 'free-from' claim. If the INCI were available and these were absent, it would be supported.
Missing
The 'all hair types' claim for a damage repair product is ambitious without specific mildness or efficacy testing across diverse hair textures.
Missing
These are ethical and marketing claims. Verification requires third-party certifications which are not publicly visible.
Missing
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.