Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
This shampoo makes ambitious hair growth and strengthening claims, but without a publicly available ingredient list or finished product evidence, consumers are left to rely solely on marketing, making it a high-risk choice for informed purchase.
₹266 • Analysed 20 September 2026
This CYAE Rosemary Hair Strength & Growth Shampoo is positioned in the competitive Indian hair care market, leveraging the popular ingredient rosemary for hair growth and anti-breakage claims. Its pricing is competitive, especially with frequent discounts on e-commerce platforms. However, the complete lack of INCI disclosure is a significant transparency gap, which is a concern under India Cosmetics Rules 2020 that mandate INCI on labels. The 'Boosts Hair Growth' claim, while common, relies solely on ingredient-level research for rosemary, not finished product data, which warrants caution for Indian consumers prone to post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and seeking effective solutions for hair concerns.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
No finished product clinical study or test report for this specific CYAE shampoo is publicly visible. General ingredient-level research suggests rosemary oil/extract may support hair growth, often compared to minoxidil 2% in small studies, but this is not specific to the finished product formulation.
No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support this claim for the CYAE shampoo. While a shampoo can help reduce breakage by improving hair condition, the specific claim lacks substantiation for this product.
No finished product evidence is publicly visible. This claim relies on the general reputation of rosemary, not specific testing on this shampoo. The 'looking' qualifier makes it a cosmetic claim, but still requires product-specific evidence for strong support.
No specific evidence for this product. A shampoo can contain ingredients that nourish the scalp, but without an INCI, this remains unverified for the specific formulation.
No specific mildness testing or consumer panel data is publicly visible to support suitability for all hair types, especially for an active-focused shampoo. Without INCI, potential irritants cannot be assessed.
As a shampoo, it is expected to cleanse. 'Comprehensive hair care' and 'balanced' are subjective and aspirational, making this a routine claim. No specific evidence is needed beyond product function.
Subjective sensory claim, typical for a shampoo. No specific evidence is publicly visible, but this is a low-ambition claim.
A functional claim about usage frequency. Without INCI, mildness for daily use cannot be fully assessed, but it's a common shampoo claim.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Brand describes ingredient origin in its claims.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on claimed ingredients only, full INCI not available)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on claimed ingredients only, full INCI not available)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on claimed ingredients only, full INCI not available)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on claimed ingredients only, full INCI not available)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on claimed ingredients only, full INCI not available)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on claimed ingredients only, full INCI not available)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on claimed ingredients only, full INCI not available)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on claimed ingredients only, full INCI not available)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on claimed ingredients only, full INCI not available)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (based on claimed ingredients only, full INCI not available)
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
No finished product clinical study or test report for this specific CYAE shampoo is publicly visible. General ingredient-level research suggests rosemary oil/extract may support hair growth, often compared to minoxidil 2% in small studies, but this is not specific to the finished product formulation.
Mentioned only
No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support this claim for the CYAE shampoo. While a shampoo can help reduce breakage by improving hair condition, the specific claim lacks substantiation for this product.
Missing
No finished product evidence is publicly visible. This claim relies on the general reputation of rosemary, not specific testing on this shampoo. The 'looking' qualifier makes it a cosmetic claim, but still requires product-specific evidence for strong support.
Missing
No specific evidence for this product. A shampoo can contain ingredients that nourish the scalp, but without an INCI, this remains unverified for the specific formulation.
Missing
No specific mildness testing or consumer panel data is publicly visible to support suitability for all hair types, especially for an active-focused shampoo. Without INCI, potential irritants cannot be assessed.
Missing
As a shampoo, it is expected to cleanse. 'Comprehensive hair care' and 'balanced' are subjective and aspirational, making this a routine claim. No specific evidence is needed beyond product function.
Missing
Subjective sensory claim, typical for a shampoo. No specific evidence is publicly visible, but this is a low-ambition claim.
Missing
A functional claim about usage frequency. Without INCI, mildness for daily use cannot be fully assessed, but it's a common shampoo claim.
Missing
Claimed on multiple platforms. Without the full INCI, this cannot be definitively verified, but it is a common 'free-from' claim. Assuming true unless contradicted by INCI.
Missing
Claimed on multiple platforms. Without the full INCI, this cannot be definitively verified, but it is a common 'free-from' claim. Assuming true unless contradicted by INCI.
Missing
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
