Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
This Davines shampoo offers effective conditioning for dry hair, but its 'free-from' claims are directly disproven by its own ingredient list, creating significant consumer confusion and trust issues.
₹1,950 • Analysed 17 August 2026
This Davines shampoo is positioned as a premium product for dry hair in the Indian market, with a price point of Rs. 1950 for 250ml. While the formula contains beneficial conditioning agents for India's varied climate, the brand's explicit 'Paraben-free' and 'Sulphate-free' claims are directly contradicted by the INCI, raising significant ASCI concerns for truthful advertising. Consumers should be aware of this discrepancy when considering the product's claims.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
Formula contains conditioning agents (Amodimethicone, Dimethicone, Polyquaternium-7) and humectants (Glycerin, Hydrolyzed Sweet Almond Protein) that support moisturizing and softening for dry hair.
Surfactant blend (Sodium Laureth Sulfate, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Sodium Olivamphoacetate, Coco-Glucoside, Lauryl Glucoside) creates foam and cleanses. Conditioning agents (Amodimethicone, Dimethicone, Polyquaternium-7) and humectants (Glycerin) contribute to softness and hydration.
The specific 'Yellow Melon extract' (Cucumis Melo Fruit Extract) is not found in the retrieved INCI list. `Eruca Sativa Leaf Extract` is present, but its specific contribution to 'prolonged hydration' in a rinse-off product is not supported by finished product evidence.
The retrieved INCI list explicitly contains `Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben`. This claim is directly contradicted.
The retrieved INCI list explicitly contains `Sodium Laureth Sulfate`. This claim is directly contradicted.
Brand states the pH. This is a beneficial claim for scalp health.
Brand states 'Dermatologically tested' but no further details or results are publicly visible.
Quantified claim made by the brand, but no supporting methodology or report is publicly visible to verify the claim.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against INCIDecoder.
Brand describes ingredient origin in its claims.
Screened against the ingredient database (18 of 36 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
Benzophenone-4: Water-soluble UV absorber Methylparaben: Weak estrogenic activity Ethylparaben: Short-chain paraben Propylparaben: Stronger endocrine disruption evidence Butylparaben: Strongest endocrine disruption signal among permitted parabens butylparaben: Longer-chain paraben with endocrine-activity concern.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Built on a stronger sulphate surfactant (sodium laureth sulfate) - effective, but can feel stripping on sensitive skin or in hard water.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Brand references ingredient origin / traceability.
Sustainability & Ethics
Brand references biodegradability.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Aqua/Water/Eau (Water) |
Sodium Laureth Sulfate |
Cocamidopropyl Betaine |
Sodium Olivamphoacetate |
Sodium Chloride |
Glyceryl Oleate |
Coco-Glucoside |
Sodium Lauryl Glucose Carboxylate |
Lauryl Glucoside |
Amodimethicone |
Hydrolyzed Sweet Almond Protein |
C11-15 Pareth-7 |
Dicaprylyl Ether |
Lauryl Alcohol |
Eruca Sativa Leaf Extract |
Propylene Glycol |
Dimethicone |
Polyquaternium-7 |
Trideceth-12 |
Glycerin |
PEG-120 Methyl Glucose Dioleate |
Laureth-9 |
Benzophenone-4 |
Phenoxyethanol |
Methylparaben |
Ethylparaben |
Propylparaben |
Butylparaben |
Isobutylparaben |
Disodium EDTA |
Citric Acid |
Potassium Sorbate |
Red 4 (Ci 14700) |
Yellow 5 Lake (Ci 19140) |
Blue 1 Lake (Ci 42090) (Ci 42090) |
Perfume (Fragrance) |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“Paraben-free”
Claim about product composition is directly contradicted by the ingredient list, which is misleading.
“Sulphate-free”
Claim about product composition is directly contradicted by the ingredient list, which is misleading.
“98.3% biodegradable ingredients”
Quantified claim without a published, verifiable study to support the percentage.
“95.3% natural origin ingredients”
Quantified claim without a published, verifiable study to support the percentage.
Formula contains conditioning agents (Amodimethicone, Dimethicone, Polyquaternium-7) and humectants (Glycerin, Hydrolyzed Sweet Almond Protein) that support moisturizing and softening for dry hair.
Mentioned only
Surfactant blend (Sodium Laureth Sulfate, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Sodium Olivamphoacetate, Coco-Glucoside, Lauryl Glucoside) creates foam and cleanses. Conditioning agents (Amodimethicone, Dimethicone, Polyquaternium-7) and humectants (Glycerin) contribute to softness and hydration.
Mentioned only
The specific 'Yellow Melon extract' (Cucumis Melo Fruit Extract) is not found in the retrieved INCI list. `Eruca Sativa Leaf Extract` is present, but its specific contribution to 'prolonged hydration' in a rinse-off product is not supported by finished product evidence.
Missing
The retrieved INCI list explicitly contains `Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben`. This claim is directly contradicted.
Missing
The retrieved INCI list explicitly contains `Sodium Laureth Sulfate`. This claim is directly contradicted.
Missing
Brand states the pH. This is a beneficial claim for scalp health.
Evidence visible
Brand states 'Dermatologically tested' but no further details or results are publicly visible.
Evidence visible
Quantified claim made by the brand, but no supporting methodology or report is publicly visible to verify the claim.
Evidence visible
Quantified claim made by the brand, but no supporting methodology or report is publicly visible to verify the claim.
Evidence visible
Corporate sustainability claim made by the brand. No external verification visible.
Evidence visible
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
Benzophenone-4: Water-soluble UV absorber Methylparaben: Weak estrogenic activity Ethylparaben: Short-chain paraben Propylparaben: Stronger endocrine disruption evidence Butylparaben: Strongest endocrine disruption signal among permitted parabens butylparaben: Longer-chain paraben with endocrine-activity concern.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Built on a stronger sulphate surfactant (sodium laureth sulfate) - effective, but can feel stripping on sensitive skin or in hard water.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Brand references ingredient origin / traceability.
Sustainability & Ethics
Brand references biodegradability.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
The specific 'Yellow Melon extract' (Cucumis Melo Fruit Extract) is not found in the retrieved INCI list. `Eruca Sativa Leaf Extract` is present, but its specific contribution to 'prolonged hydration' in a rinse-off product is not supported by finished product evidence.
The retrieved INCI list explicitly contains `Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben`. This claim is directly contradicted.
The retrieved INCI list explicitly contains `Sodium Laureth Sulfate`. This claim is directly contradicted.
Brand states the pH. This is a beneficial claim for scalp health.
Brand states 'Dermatologically tested' but no further details or results are publicly visible.
Quantified claim made by the brand, but no supporting methodology or report is publicly visible to verify the claim.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
Formula contains conditioning agents (Amodimethicone, Dimethicone, Polyquaternium-7) and humectants (Glycerin, Hydrolyzed Sweet Almond Protein) that support moisturizing and softening for dry hair.
Mentioned only
Surfactant blend (Sodium Laureth Sulfate, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Sodium Olivamphoacetate, Coco-Glucoside, Lauryl Glucoside) creates foam and cleanses. Conditioning agents (Amodimethicone, Dimethicone, Polyquaternium-7) and humectants (Glycerin) contribute to softness and hydration.
Mentioned only
The specific 'Yellow Melon extract' (Cucumis Melo Fruit Extract) is not found in the retrieved INCI list. `Eruca Sativa Leaf Extract` is present, but its specific contribution to 'prolonged hydration' in a rinse-off product is not supported by finished product evidence.
Missing
The retrieved INCI list explicitly contains `Methylparaben, Ethylparaben, Propylparaben, Butylparaben, Isobutylparaben`. This claim is directly contradicted.
Missing
The retrieved INCI list explicitly contains `Sodium Laureth Sulfate`. This claim is directly contradicted.
Missing
Brand states the pH. This is a beneficial claim for scalp health.
Evidence visible
Brand states 'Dermatologically tested' but no further details or results are publicly visible.
Evidence visible
Quantified claim made by the brand, but no supporting methodology or report is publicly visible to verify the claim.
Evidence visible
Quantified claim made by the brand, but no supporting methodology or report is publicly visible to verify the claim.
Evidence visible
Corporate sustainability claim made by the brand. No external verification visible.
Evidence visible
“Paraben-free”
Claim about product composition is directly contradicted by the ingredient list, which is misleading.
“Sulphate-free”
Claim about product composition is directly contradicted by the ingredient list, which is misleading.
“98.3% biodegradable ingredients”
Quantified claim without a published, verifiable study to support the percentage.
“95.3% natural origin ingredients”
Quantified claim without a published, verifiable study to support the percentage.
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
