Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
This DRDermapi shampoo offers an attractive price for frizz control but suffers from a critical lack of ingredient transparency, leaving its ambitious claims largely unverified by public evidence or formula details.
₹199 • Analysed 20 September 2026
This DRDermapi Anti Frizzfix Shampoo is positioned at a highly competitive price point in the Indian market, especially given the significant discounts from its stated MRP. Frizz control is a highly sought-after benefit in India's often humid climate, making the '24 Hours Frizz Control' claim particularly appealing. However, the complete absence of a publicly visible INCI list is a significant transparency concern under India Cosmetics Rules 2020, which mandates full ingredient disclosure. Several claims, including the quantified '24 Hours Frizz Control' and the absolute 'Frizz Free Hair', lack specific product-level evidence, raising ASCI compliance concerns.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
This is the product's core identity. As a shampoo, it is expected to cleanse. The 'anti-frizz' aspect is a functional claim, but specific efficacy is unverified without product testing or INCI.
This is a quantified, time-bound performance claim. No finished product clinical or instrumental study is publicly visible to support 24-hour frizz control for this specific shampoo.
This indicates the target hair type. Without INCI, it's not possible to confirm specific ingredients tailored for dry/frizzy hair, but it's a common product positioning.
A functional claim for frizz control. No finished product evidence is publicly visible. The claim relies on general ingredient theory for anti-frizz products, but the specific formula is unknown.
This is a performance claim related to hair health. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support strengthening or breakage reduction for this shampoo. Without INCI, specific strengthening ingredients cannot be verified.
A common functional claim for shampoos targeting dry hair. While plausible for a well-formulated shampoo, no specific evidence for this product's hydrating properties is publicly visible.
These are cosmetic appearance claims. Many shampoos aim for these results. Without INCI, it's not possible to assess the formula's ability to deliver these, and no product-specific evidence is visible.
These are appearance claims. 'Frizz Free' is an absolute claim that is difficult to substantiate fully. No finished product evidence is publicly visible.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not retrieved).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not retrieved). Full INCI disclosure is mandatory under India Cosmetics Rules 2020, but is not publicly available for this product.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not retrieved).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not retrieved).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not retrieved).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not retrieved).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not retrieved).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not retrieved).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not retrieved).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information (INCI not retrieved).
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“Frizz Control Upto 24 Hours”
Quantified claim ('Upto 24 Hours') without publicly visible, verifiable study.
“Smooth, Shiny & Frizz Free Hair”
The term 'Frizz Free' is an absolute claim that is challenging to substantiate without robust clinical evidence.
“Dermatologist-Approved”
Claim of 'Dermatologist-Approved' is made generally by the brand, but no specific supporting evidence (e.g., test report, certification) for this product is provided.
This is the product's core identity. As a shampoo, it is expected to cleanse. The 'anti-frizz' aspect is a functional claim, but specific efficacy is unverified without product testing or INCI.
Missing
This is a quantified, time-bound performance claim. No finished product clinical or instrumental study is publicly visible to support 24-hour frizz control for this specific shampoo.
Missing
This indicates the target hair type. Without INCI, it's not possible to confirm specific ingredients tailored for dry/frizzy hair, but it's a common product positioning.
Missing
A functional claim for frizz control. No finished product evidence is publicly visible. The claim relies on general ingredient theory for anti-frizz products, but the specific formula is unknown.
Missing
This is a performance claim related to hair health. No finished product evidence is publicly visible to support strengthening or breakage reduction for this shampoo. Without INCI, specific strengthening ingredients cannot be verified.
Missing
A common functional claim for shampoos targeting dry hair. While plausible for a well-formulated shampoo, no specific evidence for this product's hydrating properties is publicly visible.
Missing
These are cosmetic appearance claims. Many shampoos aim for these results. Without INCI, it's not possible to assess the formula's ability to deliver these, and no product-specific evidence is visible.
Missing
These are appearance claims. 'Frizz Free' is an absolute claim that is difficult to substantiate fully. No finished product evidence is publicly visible.
Missing
A general suitability claim. Most shampoos are suitable for all genders.
Missing
This is a general brand claim for DRDermapi products. No specific 'dermatologist-approved' testing or certification for this particular Anti Frizzfix Shampoo is publicly visible.
Missing
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
