Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
The Kay Beauty Hydrabase Water Crème makes impressive, clinically-backed claims for hydration and barrier repair, but its lack of a publicly available INCI list creates a significant transparency gap for the ingredient-conscious consumer.
₹1,299 • Analysed 2 September 2026
The Kay Beauty Hydrabase Water Crème is positioned as a premium moisturizer in the Indian market, priced at Rs. 1299 for 50g. Its 'lightweight, water-based gel' format is well-suited for India's often hot and humid climate, aiming to provide hydration without feeling heavy. The brand's strong emphasis on 'clinically tested on Indian women with sensitive skin' directly addresses a key consumer concern in India, where sensitive skin and pigmentation issues are common. The claims of 'fragrance-free', 'non-comedogenic', and 'hypoallergenic' are also highly relevant for Indian consumers seeking gentle yet effective skincare. The brand has provided strong clinical evidence for its hydration and barrier claims, which is a positive for ASCI compliance, as quantified claims are backed by a stated external clinical study. However, the lack of a publicly available full INCI list is a significant transparency gap for the Indian consumer who is increasingly ingredient-aware.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
The product is described as a 'lightweight, water-based gel moisturiser' and clinical studies support its hydrating properties.
Stated to be 'Powered by Centella Asiatica, Ceramides and Skin-mimetic Lipids' which are known barrier-supporting ingredients. Clinical studies claim 'strengthens the moisture barrier in just 30 minutes' and '35% enhanced moisture barrier from the first application'.
Supported by clinical claims of '100-hour lasting hydration' and 'Boosts skin hydration by 138%'.
The brand states it 'soothes and comforts dry skin in 30 minutes' and is 'formulated for sensitive skin'. It is also 'hypoallergenic' and 'dermatologist-tested'.
This is a subjective claim, but it aligns with the soothing and hydrating properties supported by clinical testing for sensitive skin.
The brand explicitly states 'Based on an external clinical study conducted in May 2026. Test results compared treated versus untreated skin when the test area was left unwashed for 100 hours.' and provides quantified results.
Supported by an external clinical study conducted in May 2026, comparing treated vs. untreated skin when unwashed for 100 hours.
Supported by an external clinical study conducted in May 2026.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Standards & Compliance
No retinoid or other pregnancy-cautioned active found in the screen.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check. INCI disclosure is mandatory on label.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
The product is described as a 'lightweight, water-based gel moisturiser' and clinical studies support its hydrating properties.
Evidence visible
Stated to be 'Powered by Centella Asiatica, Ceramides and Skin-mimetic Lipids' which are known barrier-supporting ingredients. Clinical studies claim 'strengthens the moisture barrier in just 30 minutes' and '35% enhanced moisture barrier from the first application'.
Evidence visible
Supported by clinical claims of '100-hour lasting hydration' and 'Boosts skin hydration by 138%'.
Evidence visible
The brand states it 'soothes and comforts dry skin in 30 minutes' and is 'formulated for sensitive skin'. It is also 'hypoallergenic' and 'dermatologist-tested'.
Evidence visible
This is a subjective claim, but it aligns with the soothing and hydrating properties supported by clinical testing for sensitive skin.
Evidence visible
The brand explicitly states 'Based on an external clinical study conducted in May 2026. Test results compared treated versus untreated skin when the test area was left unwashed for 100 hours.' and provides quantified results.
Evidence visible
Supported by an external clinical study conducted in May 2026, comparing treated vs. untreated skin when unwashed for 100 hours.
Evidence visible
Supported by an external clinical study conducted in May 2026.
Evidence visible
Supported by an external clinical study conducted in May 2026.
Evidence visible
Supported by an external clinical study conducted in May 2026.
Evidence visible
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
The brand states it 'soothes and comforts dry skin in 30 minutes' and is 'formulated for sensitive skin'. It is also 'hypoallergenic' and 'dermatologist-tested'.
This is a subjective claim, but it aligns with the soothing and hydrating properties supported by clinical testing for sensitive skin.
The brand explicitly states 'Based on an external clinical study conducted in May 2026. Test results compared treated versus untreated skin when the test area was left unwashed for 100 hours.' and provides quantified results.
Supported by an external clinical study conducted in May 2026, comparing treated vs. untreated skin when unwashed for 100 hours.
Supported by an external clinical study conducted in May 2026.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check. INCI disclosure is mandatory on label.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on claimed actives. Full INCI not available for comprehensive check.
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
The product is described as a 'lightweight, water-based gel moisturiser' and clinical studies support its hydrating properties.
Evidence visible
Stated to be 'Powered by Centella Asiatica, Ceramides and Skin-mimetic Lipids' which are known barrier-supporting ingredients. Clinical studies claim 'strengthens the moisture barrier in just 30 minutes' and '35% enhanced moisture barrier from the first application'.
Evidence visible
Supported by clinical claims of '100-hour lasting hydration' and 'Boosts skin hydration by 138%'.
Evidence visible
The brand states it 'soothes and comforts dry skin in 30 minutes' and is 'formulated for sensitive skin'. It is also 'hypoallergenic' and 'dermatologist-tested'.
Evidence visible
This is a subjective claim, but it aligns with the soothing and hydrating properties supported by clinical testing for sensitive skin.
Evidence visible
The brand explicitly states 'Based on an external clinical study conducted in May 2026. Test results compared treated versus untreated skin when the test area was left unwashed for 100 hours.' and provides quantified results.
Evidence visible
Supported by an external clinical study conducted in May 2026, comparing treated vs. untreated skin when unwashed for 100 hours.
Evidence visible
Supported by an external clinical study conducted in May 2026.
Evidence visible
Supported by an external clinical study conducted in May 2026.
Evidence visible
Supported by an external clinical study conducted in May 2026.
Evidence visible
