Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →Kenaz Oud Ameer offers an accessible entry into luxury-inspired perfumery with a strong scent profile and concentration, but its lack of full ingredient disclosure and unverified longevity claims warrant caution for the discerning consumer.
₹499 • Analysed 28 August 2026
Kenaz Oud Ameer is positioned as an 'Affordable Luxury' perfume at ₹499 for 100ml, making it accessible to a broad Indian consumer base. The brand emphasizes its 'Dubai-Crafted, Made in India' origin, appealing to both the allure of Middle Eastern fragrances and local manufacturing. While claims of '12+ hours' longevity are ambitious for India's often hot and humid climate, the stated 20% fragrance oil concentration provides a plausible basis for extended wear. The absence of a full INCI list is a transparency concern under India Cosmetics Rules 2020, which mandates INCI disclosure on product labels.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
This is an aspirational and emotional claim. No publicly visible evidence (e.g., market research, consumer surveys) supports 'most loved' or 'true royal elegance'.
The brand states 20% fragrance oil concentration, which is consistent with Eau de Parfum. The '12+ hours' longevity claim is a performance claim. While the concentration supports the ambition, no finished-product clinical or instrumental study is publicly visible to verify the exact duration.
This describes the scent profile, which is subjective but consistent with the listed notes (Oud, Saffron, Rose).
This is an aspirational marketing claim. No publicly visible evidence supports the 'attract attention' aspect.
The '800+ sprays' claim is a quantifiable functional claim. No publicly visible evidence (e.g., internal testing report on spray count) supports this specific number.
Similar to the '12+ hours' claim, this is a performance claim. While the 20% fragrance oil concentration supports the ambition, no finished-product clinical or instrumental study is publicly visible to verify the exact duration.
The brand consistently states IFRA certification, which indicates compliance with fragrance safety standards. This is a strong claim for ingredient safety.
The claim 'Pure Parfum' is supported by the stated 20% fragrance oil concentration, which falls within the typical range for Eau de Parfum/Parfum.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Transparency
Active percentages are disclosed for the hero ingredient(s).
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
Full INCI list not publicly available, which is a requirement for cosmetic products in India.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“Unisex Luxury, Redefined - The best unisex perfume for those who crave elegance and depth.”
Uses superlative 'best' without disclosed methodology or comparative study.
This is an aspirational and emotional claim. No publicly visible evidence (e.g., market research, consumer surveys) supports 'most loved' or 'true royal elegance'.
Missing
The brand states 20% fragrance oil concentration, which is consistent with Eau de Parfum. The '12+ hours' longevity claim is a performance claim. While the concentration supports the ambition, no finished-product clinical or instrumental study is publicly visible to verify the exact duration.
Evidence visible
This describes the scent profile, which is subjective but consistent with the listed notes (Oud, Saffron, Rose).
Mentioned only
This is an aspirational marketing claim. No publicly visible evidence supports the 'attract attention' aspect.
Missing
The '800+ sprays' claim is a quantifiable functional claim. No publicly visible evidence (e.g., internal testing report on spray count) supports this specific number.
Missing
Similar to the '12+ hours' claim, this is a performance claim. While the 20% fragrance oil concentration supports the ambition, no finished-product clinical or instrumental study is publicly visible to verify the exact duration.
Evidence visible
The brand consistently states IFRA certification, which indicates compliance with fragrance safety standards. This is a strong claim for ingredient safety.
Evidence visible
The claim 'Pure Parfum' is supported by the stated 20% fragrance oil concentration, which falls within the typical range for Eau de Parfum/Parfum.
Mentioned only
This functional claim is supported by the stated 20% fragrance oil concentration, which generally leads to longer wear. However, specific finished-product longevity data is not publicly visible.
Evidence visible
This refers to the brand's origin or inspiration. No specific evidence is needed beyond brand statement.
Missing
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
This describes the scent profile, which is subjective but consistent with the listed notes (Oud, Saffron, Rose).
This is an aspirational marketing claim. No publicly visible evidence supports the 'attract attention' aspect.
The '800+ sprays' claim is a quantifiable functional claim. No publicly visible evidence (e.g., internal testing report on spray count) supports this specific number.
Similar to the '12+ hours' claim, this is a performance claim. While the 20% fragrance oil concentration supports the ambition, no finished-product clinical or instrumental study is publicly visible to verify the exact duration.
The brand consistently states IFRA certification, which indicates compliance with fragrance safety standards. This is a strong claim for ingredient safety.
The claim 'Pure Parfum' is supported by the stated 20% fragrance oil concentration, which falls within the typical range for Eau de Parfum/Parfum.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
Full INCI list not publicly available, which is a requirement for cosmetic products in India.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on available information. Full INCI not available to confirm.
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
This is an aspirational and emotional claim. No publicly visible evidence (e.g., market research, consumer surveys) supports 'most loved' or 'true royal elegance'.
Missing
The brand states 20% fragrance oil concentration, which is consistent with Eau de Parfum. The '12+ hours' longevity claim is a performance claim. While the concentration supports the ambition, no finished-product clinical or instrumental study is publicly visible to verify the exact duration.
Evidence visible
This describes the scent profile, which is subjective but consistent with the listed notes (Oud, Saffron, Rose).
Mentioned only
This is an aspirational marketing claim. No publicly visible evidence supports the 'attract attention' aspect.
Missing
The '800+ sprays' claim is a quantifiable functional claim. No publicly visible evidence (e.g., internal testing report on spray count) supports this specific number.
Missing
Similar to the '12+ hours' claim, this is a performance claim. While the 20% fragrance oil concentration supports the ambition, no finished-product clinical or instrumental study is publicly visible to verify the exact duration.
Evidence visible
The brand consistently states IFRA certification, which indicates compliance with fragrance safety standards. This is a strong claim for ingredient safety.
Evidence visible
The claim 'Pure Parfum' is supported by the stated 20% fragrance oil concentration, which falls within the typical range for Eau de Parfum/Parfum.
Mentioned only
This functional claim is supported by the stated 20% fragrance oil concentration, which generally leads to longer wear. However, specific finished-product longevity data is not publicly visible.
Evidence visible
This refers to the brand's origin or inspiration. No specific evidence is needed beyond brand statement.
Missing
“Unisex Luxury, Redefined - The best unisex perfume for those who crave elegance and depth.”
Uses superlative 'best' without disclosed methodology or comparative study.