Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
This mineral sunscreen delivers on its promise of a non-white-cast, pleasant texture for sun protection, but its 'silicone-free' claim is false, and its ambitious anti-aging promises are not visibly substantiated, leading to significant consumer confusion risk.
₹699 • Analysed 11 October 2026
This Sun Scoop Mineral Sunscreen SPF50 is positioned as a premium option for daily sun protection in India. Its tinted, zero white cast formula is a significant benefit for Indian skin tones (Fitzpatrick III-V) which are prone to white cast from traditional mineral sunscreens. However, the brand's 'Silicone-Free' claim is directly contradicted by the INCI, which is a serious ASCI concern. Additionally, several strong anti-aging claims lack visible finished-product evidence, raising further ASCI compliance questions. The Rs.699 price point for 50g is at the higher end for sunscreens in the Indian market.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
Zinc Oxide is present as a mineral filter. However, no specific finished product SPF 50 test report (e.g., ISO 24444 compliant) is publicly visible to substantiate this exact rating.
Zinc Oxide provides broad-spectrum protection, but no specific finished product test report (e.g., critical wavelength) is publicly visible to confirm the 'broad spectrum' claim for this formulation.
No specific finished product PA test report is publicly visible to substantiate this exact rating.
The formula contains Iron Oxides (77491/77492), which are colorants used to tint the sunscreen and mitigate white cast. This is a common and effective strategy for mineral sunscreens.
The formula is rich in silicones (e.g., Caprylyl Methicone, Cyclopentasiloxane), which are known to provide a lightweight, non-tacky feel and aid spreadability.
The silicone-heavy formulation contributes to a non-greasy finish, which is a characteristic of these ingredients.
No specific finished product water or sweat resistance test report (e.g., ISO 16217 or similar) is publicly visible to substantiate this claim.
This is a general claim. While mineral filters are often well-tolerated, no specific mildness or compatibility testing across a diverse range of skin types is publicly visible.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against INCIDecoder.
Screened against the ingredient database (10 of 23 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
Cyclopentasiloxane: D5 bioaccumulates in aquatic environment
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
No EU-declarable or database-flagged allergen found in the list.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Caprylyl Methicone |
PEG-12 Dimethicone/PPG-20 Crosspolymer |
Zinc Oxide |
Coco-Caprylate |
Cyclopentasiloxane |
Dimethicone/Vinyl Dimethicone Crosspolymer |
Dicaprylyl Carbonate |
Stearalkonium Hectorite |
Propylene Carbonate |
C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate |
Decyl Oleate |
Propanediol |
Iron Oxides 77491/77492 |
Tocopheryl Acetate |
Butylated Hydroxytoluene |
Cocos Nucifera Oil |
Gardenia Taitensis Flower Extract |
Glycine Soja Oil |
Daucus Carota Sativa Seed Oil |
Polyglyceryl-3 Diisostearate |
Oryza Sativa (Rice) Extract |
Oryza Sativa (Rice) Germ Extract |
Rubus Idaeus (Raspberry) Fruit Extract |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
Cyclopentasiloxane is present, which is restricted in leave-on products (max 0.1%) from 2021 due to environmental concerns (PBT/vPvB). Its presence is noted.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“Water & Sweat Resistant”
This is a quantified performance claim that requires specific testing to substantiate, which is not publicly visible.
“Dermatologically Tested”
Claiming 'Dermatologically Tested' without providing any verifiable details of the test is an ASCI concern.
“Non-comedogenic”
Claiming 'Non-comedogenic' without providing any verifiable details of the test is an ASCI concern.
“Silicone-Free”
This claim is factually incorrect and misleading, directly contradicted by the product's ingredient list, which is a clear violation of ASCI Chapter 1 (Truthful and Honest).
“Boosts collagen”
This is a strong, quantified biological claim that requires robust clinical evidence, which is not publicly visible.
“Reduces fine lines”
This is a strong, quantified appearance claim that requires robust clinical evidence, which is not publicly visible.
“Repairs skin barrier”
This is a strong biological claim that requires robust clinical evidence, which is not publicly visible.
Zinc Oxide is present as a mineral filter. However, no specific finished product SPF 50 test report (e.g., ISO 24444 compliant) is publicly visible to substantiate this exact rating.
Missing
Zinc Oxide provides broad-spectrum protection, but no specific finished product test report (e.g., critical wavelength) is publicly visible to confirm the 'broad spectrum' claim for this formulation.
Missing
No specific finished product PA test report is publicly visible to substantiate this exact rating.
Missing
The formula contains Iron Oxides (77491/77492), which are colorants used to tint the sunscreen and mitigate white cast. This is a common and effective strategy for mineral sunscreens.
Mentioned only
The formula is rich in silicones (e.g., Caprylyl Methicone, Cyclopentasiloxane), which are known to provide a lightweight, non-tacky feel and aid spreadability.
Mentioned only
The silicone-heavy formulation contributes to a non-greasy finish, which is a characteristic of these ingredients.
Mentioned only
No specific finished product water or sweat resistance test report (e.g., ISO 16217 or similar) is publicly visible to substantiate this claim.
Missing
This is a general claim. While mineral filters are often well-tolerated, no specific mildness or compatibility testing across a diverse range of skin types is publicly visible.
Mentioned only
The brand states it is 'Dermatologically Tested', but no details of the testing (methodology, sample size, results) are publicly visible.
Missing
The brand states it is 'Non-comedogenic', but no details of the testing (methodology, sample size, results) are publicly visible.
Missing
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
