Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
SunKage SPF 50+ offers strong physical sun protection with a well-formulated active, but its ambitious claims, particularly on certain platforms, outrun the publicly visible finished-product evidence, and ingredient transparency is incomplete.
₹269 • Analysed 11 October 2026
SunKage 100% Physical Sunscreen SPF 50+ is positioned as a robust sun protection solution for the Indian market, featuring 25% Zinc Oxide for broad-spectrum defense against UVA, UVB, and IR rays. Its 'water-resistant' and 'non-comedogenic' claims are beneficial for India's humid climate and diverse skin types. However, the claim of 'Protection against skin cancer' on Graziaup.com is a significant ASCI and CDSCO drug boundary concern, as it implies a therapeutic effect beyond a cosmetic product's scope without drug registration. The varying PA ratings across Flipkart listings also indicate inconsistency in UVA protection claims. The price point, ranging from Rs.459 to Rs.699 for 50ml, places it in the mid-to-premium segment for sunscreens in India.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
Supported by the presence of Zinc Oxide as the primary UV filter and its disclosed concentration (25% w/w).
SPF 50+ is claimed, and Zinc Oxide (25% w/w) is a strong physical filter. However, no ISO 24444 compliant test report for the finished product is publicly visible to substantiate the exact SPF value.
Zinc Oxide is known to provide broad-spectrum protection against UVA, UVB, and some infrared radiation. However, no finished product test (e.g., PA rating, UVA-PF) is publicly visible to confirm the extent of UVA/IR protection for this specific product. Flipkart listings show varying PA ratings (NA, PA+++, PA+).
Claimed across multiple platforms. No specific water resistance test duration (e.g., 40 or 80 minutes) or methodology is publicly visible.
The retrieved partial INCI does not list parabens. This claim is supported by the absence of parabens in the disclosed ingredients.
Claimed to be formulated to minimize allergic reactions. No specific hypoallergenic testing data or certification is publicly visible.
Claimed to be less likely to clog pores. No specific non-comedogenicity testing data is publicly visible.
The retrieved partial INCI does not list 'Parfum' or 'Fragrance'. This claim is supported by the absence of fragrance in the disclosed ingredients.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against the label.
Screened against the ingredient database (1 of 5 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
No ingredient with a recognised endocrine-activity concern found in the database.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
No EU-declarable or database-flagged allergen found in the list.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Ingredient Transparency
Active percentages are disclosed for the hero ingredient(s).
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Processed Zinc Oxide (Micronised) (Equivalent to Zinc Oxide 25% w/w) |
Carthamus Tinctorius Oil (Safflower Oil) (3.0% w/w) |
Aloe Vera (2.0% w/w) |
Tocopheryl Acetate (Vitamin E) (0.5% w/w) |
Gel Base: q.s. |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on disclosed partial INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on disclosed partial INCI. Full INCI disclosure is required, which is not fully met by 'Gel Base: q.s.'.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on disclosed partial INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on disclosed partial INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on disclosed partial INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on disclosed partial INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on disclosed partial INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on disclosed partial INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on disclosed partial INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on disclosed partial INCI.
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“Protection against skin cancer”
Claiming 'protection against skin cancer' for a cosmetic product without CDSCO drug registration for such a therapeutic claim crosses into drug territory.
Supported by the presence of Zinc Oxide as the primary UV filter and its disclosed concentration (25% w/w).
Mentioned only
SPF 50+ is claimed, and Zinc Oxide (25% w/w) is a strong physical filter. However, no ISO 24444 compliant test report for the finished product is publicly visible to substantiate the exact SPF value.
Missing
Zinc Oxide is known to provide broad-spectrum protection against UVA, UVB, and some infrared radiation. However, no finished product test (e.g., PA rating, UVA-PF) is publicly visible to confirm the extent of UVA/IR protection for this specific product. Flipkart listings show varying PA ratings (NA, PA+++, PA+).
Mentioned only
Claimed across multiple platforms. No specific water resistance test duration (e.g., 40 or 80 minutes) or methodology is publicly visible.
Missing
The retrieved partial INCI does not list parabens. This claim is supported by the absence of parabens in the disclosed ingredients.
Evidence visible
Claimed to be formulated to minimize allergic reactions. No specific hypoallergenic testing data or certification is publicly visible.
Missing
Claimed to be less likely to clog pores. No specific non-comedogenicity testing data is publicly visible.
Missing
The retrieved partial INCI does not list 'Parfum' or 'Fragrance'. This claim is supported by the absence of fragrance in the disclosed ingredients.
Evidence visible
Claimed to be dermatologically tested. No specific details of the testing (e.g., patch test results, population, methodology) are publicly visible.
Evidence visible
Zinc oxide and Vitamin E are known to help protect against sun damage that leads to tanning and uneven tone. However, this is ingredient-level evidence, not finished product evidence for 'managing' these concerns.
Mentioned only
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
