Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
This product presents a critical discrepancy where its core claims of being a 'Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50 PA++++' are directly contradicted by its retrieved ingredient list, which contains no UV filters and an antiperspirant active, rendering it unsuitable for sun protection as advertised.
₹699 • Analysed 11 October 2026
The product is positioned as a premium mineral sunscreen at Rs.13.98/g, which is competitive for high-SPF formulations in India. However, the provided ingredient list fundamentally contradicts the 'Mineral Sunscreen SPF 50 PA++++' claims, as it lacks any UV filters and contains an antiperspirant active. This raises significant concerns regarding ASCI compliance for misleading claims and the product's actual function in India's high UV environment.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
The provided INCI list (from INCIDecoder) does not contain any mineral UV filters (Zinc Oxide or Titanium Dioxide). Instead, it lists Aluminum Chlorohydrate, an antiperspirant active. This directly contradicts the 'Mineral Sunscreen' claim.
The provided INCI list contains no UV filters (mineral or chemical) that could provide SPF or PA protection. Therefore, this claim cannot be supported by the ingredient list provided.
This claim is directly linked to the presence of effective UV filters, which are absent in the provided INCI list.
The formula is silicone-heavy (Cyclopentasiloxane, Dimethicone Crosspolymer, PEG-10 Dimethicone), which typically contributes to a non-greasy, silky feel. However, without knowing the actual sunscreen base, this is an inference.
This claim is typically made for mineral sunscreens that use non-nano zinc oxide or titanium dioxide, or chemical sunscreens. Since the provided INCI contains no UV filters, this claim cannot be assessed in context.
Brand states 'Dermatologist Tested'. No specific details of the testing (method, sample size, duration, results) are publicly visible. This is a general claim of testing, not a clinical study.
Water resistance claims require specific testing (e.g., ISO 16217). Without UV filters in the INCI, this claim is fundamentally unsupportable for a sunscreen.
The provided INCI list does not contain any denatured alcohol. INCIDecoder also labels the product as alcohol-free. This claim is supported by the retrieved INCI.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against INCIDecoder.
Screened against the ingredient database (7 of 19 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
Cyclopentasiloxane: D5 bioaccumulates in aquatic environment
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
No EU-declarable or database-flagged allergen found in the list.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Cyclopentasiloxane |
Dimethicone Crosspolymer |
Aluminum Chlorohydrate |
Disteardimonium Hectorite |
Panthenol |
PEG-10 Dimethicone |
Phenoxyethanol |
Polyglyceryl-4 Isostearate |
Jeju Extract |
Porphyra Umbilicalis (Red Algae) Extract |
Silica |
Tomato Extract |
Water |
Taraktogenos Kurzii Seed Oil |
Nigella Sativa Seed Oil |
Leptospermum Scoparium Branch/Leaf Oil |
Potassium Lauroyl Wheat Amino Acids |
Palm Glycerides |
Magnolia Grandiflora Bark Extract |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on the provided INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on the provided INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on the provided INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on the provided INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on the provided INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on the provided INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on the provided INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on the provided INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on the provided INCI.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified based on the provided INCI.
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“Mineral Sunscreen”
This claim is directly contradicted by the retrieved ingredient list, which lacks the defining active ingredients for a mineral sunscreen.
“SPF 50 PA++++”
A quantified SPF/PA claim requires specific UV filters in the formula and ISO 24444/PA testing. The retrieved INCI lacks any UV filters, making this claim unsubstantiated and potentially misleading.
“Broad Spectrum Protection”
Claiming broad-spectrum protection without any visible UV filters in the ingredient list is a significant misrepresentation.
“No white cast”
A 'no white cast' claim for a mineral sunscreen implies specific formulation choices for mineral filters. Without any mineral filters in the INCI, this claim is unsubstantiated.
“Water Resistant”
A water-resistant claim for a sunscreen requires specific testing and the presence of UV filters. The absence of UV filters in the INCI makes this claim unsubstantiated.
The provided INCI list (from INCIDecoder) does not contain any mineral UV filters (Zinc Oxide or Titanium Dioxide). Instead, it lists Aluminum Chlorohydrate, an antiperspirant active. This directly contradicts the 'Mineral Sunscreen' claim.
Missing
The provided INCI list contains no UV filters (mineral or chemical) that could provide SPF or PA protection. Therefore, this claim cannot be supported by the ingredient list provided.
Missing
This claim is directly linked to the presence of effective UV filters, which are absent in the provided INCI list.
Missing
The formula is silicone-heavy (Cyclopentasiloxane, Dimethicone Crosspolymer, PEG-10 Dimethicone), which typically contributes to a non-greasy, silky feel. However, without knowing the actual sunscreen base, this is an inference.
Mentioned only
This claim is typically made for mineral sunscreens that use non-nano zinc oxide or titanium dioxide, or chemical sunscreens. Since the provided INCI contains no UV filters, this claim cannot be assessed in context.
Missing
Brand states 'Dermatologist Tested'. No specific details of the testing (method, sample size, duration, results) are publicly visible. This is a general claim of testing, not a clinical study.
Evidence visible
Water resistance claims require specific testing (e.g., ISO 16217). Without UV filters in the INCI, this claim is fundamentally unsupportable for a sunscreen.
Missing
The provided INCI list does not contain any denatured alcohol. INCIDecoder also labels the product as alcohol-free. This claim is supported by the retrieved INCI.
Mentioned only
The provided INCI list does not contain any parabens. This claim is supported by the retrieved INCI.
Mentioned only
The provided INCI list does not contain any sulphates. This claim is supported by the retrieved INCI.
Mentioned only
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
