Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →This TRESemmé mask promises salon-grade hydration and dramatic results with Polyglutamic Acid, but its ambitious claims are not backed by publicly visible finished product evidence, and a critical lack of ingredient transparency leaves consumers guessing about its full formulation.
₹143 • Analysed 4 September 2026
This TRESemmé Hydra Matrix Treatment Mask is positioned as a salon-grade hydration solution for Indian hair, leveraging Polyglutamic Acid (PGA) for intense moisture. The product is competitively priced, especially on quick commerce platforms, making it accessible. However, several ambitious claims, such as 'reduces breakage by up to 100%' and '10x hydration in 1 minute,' lack publicly visible finished product clinical evidence, raising ASCI compliance concerns. The complete absence of the INCI list for this specific mask is a significant transparency gap for Indian consumers.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
Claims 100 hours of hydration due to Polyglutamic Acid (PGA). While PGA is known for hydration, no finished product clinical study for this specific mask in India is publicly visible to substantiate the 100-hour claim. A similar product variant in other markets mentions 'instrumental test' for 3-minute plumpness/fluidity, but not directly for 100H hydration for this mask. This is ingredient-level evidence for the active, not finished product evidence for the claim.
Claimed across multiple platforms. However, the full INCI list for this specific mask could not be retrieved from public sources, so this claim cannot be verified.
Aspirational marketing language. No specific evidence is required or found for 'salon-grade' beyond brand positioning.
This is an ingredient-level claim about Polyglutamic Acid (PGA) and its comparative hydrating power. No finished product comparative study for this mask against a hyaluronic acid product is publicly visible. This is borrowed ingredient science, not product-specific proof.
An extremely ambitious, quantified claim ('up to 100%'). No finished product clinical study on breakage reduction for this mask is publicly visible. 'Up to 100%' is often used to imply a full effect, which is highly unlikely for a cosmetic product.
A strong, quantified, time-bound claim. No finished product clinical study for this mask is publicly visible to substantiate '10x hydration' in 1 minute. User testimonials mention noticing '10x hydration' but this is not clinical proof.
General cosmetic benefit. Supported by the presence of hydrating ingredients (PGA) but the 'luxuriously' aspect is subjective. No finished product evidence for 'fluid locks' specifically.
A plausible functional claim for a hair mask with hydrating ingredients like Polyglutamic Acid.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“Hydration five times more potent than Hyaluronic Acid”
Quantified comparative claim ('five times more potent') without a disclosed, verifiable study on the finished product.
“Reduces breakage by up to 100%”
Absolute and quantified claim ('up to 100%') without a published, verifiable study. This phrasing is highly problematic under ASCI guidelines for being potentially misleading.
“10x hydration in 1 minute”
Quantified claim ('10x hydration') without a published, verifiable study.
“2x faster absorption”
Quantified claim ('2x faster absorption') without a published, verifiable study.
“Holds 5x more weight in water”
Quantified claim ('Holds 5x more weight in water') presented as a product benefit, but is an ingredient property without a finished product study.
Claims 100 hours of hydration due to Polyglutamic Acid (PGA). While PGA is known for hydration, no finished product clinical study for this specific mask in India is publicly visible to substantiate the 100-hour claim. A similar product variant in other markets mentions 'instrumental test' for 3-minute plumpness/fluidity, but not directly for 100H hydration for this mask. This is ingredient-level evidence for the active, not finished product evidence for the claim.
Mentioned only
Claimed across multiple platforms. However, the full INCI list for this specific mask could not be retrieved from public sources, so this claim cannot be verified.
Missing
Aspirational marketing language. No specific evidence is required or found for 'salon-grade' beyond brand positioning.
Missing
This is an ingredient-level claim about Polyglutamic Acid (PGA) and its comparative hydrating power. No finished product comparative study for this mask against a hyaluronic acid product is publicly visible. This is borrowed ingredient science, not product-specific proof.
Mentioned only
An extremely ambitious, quantified claim ('up to 100%'). No finished product clinical study on breakage reduction for this mask is publicly visible. 'Up to 100%' is often used to imply a full effect, which is highly unlikely for a cosmetic product.
Missing
A strong, quantified, time-bound claim. No finished product clinical study for this mask is publicly visible to substantiate '10x hydration' in 1 minute. User testimonials mention noticing '10x hydration' but this is not clinical proof.
Missing
General cosmetic benefit. Supported by the presence of hydrating ingredients (PGA) but the 'luxuriously' aspect is subjective. No finished product evidence for 'fluid locks' specifically.
Mentioned only
A plausible functional claim for a hair mask with hydrating ingredients like Polyglutamic Acid.
Mentioned only
A plausible functional claim for a hair mask, especially with film-forming polymers like PGA.
Mentioned only
While a mask can offer some protection, 'strong resistance' is a high bar. No specific finished product testing for heat, dryness, or humidity resistance is publicly visible.
Missing
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
Aspirational marketing language. No specific evidence is required or found for 'salon-grade' beyond brand positioning.
This is an ingredient-level claim about Polyglutamic Acid (PGA) and its comparative hydrating power. No finished product comparative study for this mask against a hyaluronic acid product is publicly visible. This is borrowed ingredient science, not product-specific proof.
An extremely ambitious, quantified claim ('up to 100%'). No finished product clinical study on breakage reduction for this mask is publicly visible. 'Up to 100%' is often used to imply a full effect, which is highly unlikely for a cosmetic product.
A strong, quantified, time-bound claim. No finished product clinical study for this mask is publicly visible to substantiate '10x hydration' in 1 minute. User testimonials mention noticing '10x hydration' but this is not clinical proof.
General cosmetic benefit. Supported by the presence of hydrating ingredients (PGA) but the 'luxuriously' aspect is subjective. No finished product evidence for 'fluid locks' specifically.
A plausible functional claim for a hair mask with hydrating ingredients like Polyglutamic Acid.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified (Cannot verify due to missing INCI)
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
Claims 100 hours of hydration due to Polyglutamic Acid (PGA). While PGA is known for hydration, no finished product clinical study for this specific mask in India is publicly visible to substantiate the 100-hour claim. A similar product variant in other markets mentions 'instrumental test' for 3-minute plumpness/fluidity, but not directly for 100H hydration for this mask. This is ingredient-level evidence for the active, not finished product evidence for the claim.
Mentioned only
Claimed across multiple platforms. However, the full INCI list for this specific mask could not be retrieved from public sources, so this claim cannot be verified.
Missing
Aspirational marketing language. No specific evidence is required or found for 'salon-grade' beyond brand positioning.
Missing
This is an ingredient-level claim about Polyglutamic Acid (PGA) and its comparative hydrating power. No finished product comparative study for this mask against a hyaluronic acid product is publicly visible. This is borrowed ingredient science, not product-specific proof.
Mentioned only
An extremely ambitious, quantified claim ('up to 100%'). No finished product clinical study on breakage reduction for this mask is publicly visible. 'Up to 100%' is often used to imply a full effect, which is highly unlikely for a cosmetic product.
Missing
A strong, quantified, time-bound claim. No finished product clinical study for this mask is publicly visible to substantiate '10x hydration' in 1 minute. User testimonials mention noticing '10x hydration' but this is not clinical proof.
Missing
General cosmetic benefit. Supported by the presence of hydrating ingredients (PGA) but the 'luxuriously' aspect is subjective. No finished product evidence for 'fluid locks' specifically.
Mentioned only
A plausible functional claim for a hair mask with hydrating ingredients like Polyglutamic Acid.
Mentioned only
A plausible functional claim for a hair mask, especially with film-forming polymers like PGA.
Mentioned only
While a mask can offer some protection, 'strong resistance' is a high bar. No specific finished product testing for heat, dryness, or humidity resistance is publicly visible.
Missing
“Hydration five times more potent than Hyaluronic Acid”
Quantified comparative claim ('five times more potent') without a disclosed, verifiable study on the finished product.
“Reduces breakage by up to 100%”
Absolute and quantified claim ('up to 100%') without a published, verifiable study. This phrasing is highly problematic under ASCI guidelines for being potentially misleading.
“10x hydration in 1 minute”
Quantified claim ('10x hydration') without a published, verifiable study.
“2x faster absorption”
Quantified claim ('2x faster absorption') without a published, verifiable study.
“Holds 5x more weight in water”
Quantified claim ('Holds 5x more weight in water') presented as a product benefit, but is an ingredient property without a finished product study.
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps