Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
Checko's Hydrating Face Cleanser offers a solid, well-evidenced formula for daily cleansing, but its marketing overreaches with certain regulatory and environmental claims, and its limited retail presence impacts accessibility and price transparency.
₹634 • Analysed 18 August 2026
The Checko Hydrating Face Cleanser is positioned as a daily essential for normal, combination, and oily skin, a common skin type in India's humid climate. Its 'Fragrance Free' and 'Essential Oil Free' claims are beneficial for sensitive Indian skin prone to irritation. The 'FDA Approved' claim is a significant concern under Indian regulations, as cosmetics are licensed by CDSCO, not 'approved' in the drug sense, potentially misleading consumers. The price point of Rs.711 for 100ml positions it in the mid-to-premium segment for cleansers in the Indian market.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
Brand states 'Clinical studies conducted on a panel of 35 volunteers at an external testing laboratory, Mascot Spincontrol Pvt. Ltd.' and 'clinically tested to provide instant hydration'.
Brand states 'Dermatologically Tested for Safety. Certified Non-irritant to Skin.'. This implies third-party testing for safety.
In India, cosmetics are licensed by CDSCO, not 'FDA Approved' in the same way drugs are. This claim uses language typically associated with drug approval, which is misleading for a cosmetic product without specific drug licensing details. No evidence of drug approval found.
This is a safety claim that would typically be covered by extensive ingredient safety assessments and dermatological testing, which the brand states it conducts. However, specific finished product testing for carcinogenicity is not detailed.
This claim is often supported by in-vitro or in-vivo testing. The brand mentions clinical and dermatological testing, which could include non-comedogenicity assessments.
This claim is typically supported by patch testing on sensitive skin panels. The brand states 'Dermatologically Tested for Safety. Certified Non-irritant to Skin.' which is a strong indicator of such testing.
Verified by INCI list, which does not contain 'Parfum' or 'Fragrance'. The brand also explicitly states 'no added fragrance or perfume' and 'neutralized the smell with the use of multifunctional botanical extracts like witch hazel chamomile and more'.
Verified by INCI list, which does not contain any colorants (e.g., CI numbers).
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against the label.
Brand describes ingredient origin in its claims.
Screened against the ingredient database (6 of 23 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
No ingredient with a recognised endocrine-activity concern found in the database.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
No commonly-comedogenic ingredient found - a reasonable fit for acne-prone skin.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Declares 1 known allergen(s) (benzyl alcohol). Reactive skin should note these.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Uses milder (non-sulphate) surfactants.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Any proprietary 'complex' is broken down into its actual ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Brand makes a vegan / vegetarian claim.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Demineralised Water |
Lavendula Officinalis (Lavender) Water |
Sodium Cocoyl Glutamate |
Melaleuca Alternifolia (Tea Tree) Leaf Water |
Niacinamide |
Cocamidopropyl Betaine |
Decyl Glucoside |
Sodium Hyaluronate & Aqua (Hyaluronic Acid) |
Propanediol |
Hamamelis Virginiana (Witch Hazel) Extract |
Bambusa Vulgaris (Bamboo) Extract |
Chamomilla Recutita (Chamomile) Extract |
Xylitol (and) Glucose (and) Anhydroxylitol (and) Phoenix Dactylifera (Date) Extract |
Polyacrylate Crosspolymer-6 |
Sodium PCA |
Pentylene Glycol |
Benzyl Alcohol and Dehydroacetic Acid |
Zinc PCA |
Panthenol |
Allantoin |
Lactic Acid |
Phenylpropanol |
Sodium Phytate & Aqua & Alcohol |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“FDA Approved.”
Claim uses 'FDA Approved' which implies drug-like approval, but the product is a cosmetic. This crosses into drug boundary language without evidence of drug licensing.
“Carbon Neutral.”
Claim of 'Carbon Neutral' without publicly visible certification or methodology is an absolute environmental claim that requires substantiation.
Brand states 'Clinical studies conducted on a panel of 35 volunteers at an external testing laboratory, Mascot Spincontrol Pvt. Ltd.' and 'clinically tested to provide instant hydration'.
Evidence visible
Brand states 'Dermatologically Tested for Safety. Certified Non-irritant to Skin.'. This implies third-party testing for safety.
Evidence visible
In India, cosmetics are licensed by CDSCO, not 'FDA Approved' in the same way drugs are. This claim uses language typically associated with drug approval, which is misleading for a cosmetic product without specific drug licensing details. No evidence of drug approval found.
Missing
This is a safety claim that would typically be covered by extensive ingredient safety assessments and dermatological testing, which the brand states it conducts. However, specific finished product testing for carcinogenicity is not detailed.
Evidence visible
This claim is often supported by in-vitro or in-vivo testing. The brand mentions clinical and dermatological testing, which could include non-comedogenicity assessments.
Evidence visible
This claim is typically supported by patch testing on sensitive skin panels. The brand states 'Dermatologically Tested for Safety. Certified Non-irritant to Skin.' which is a strong indicator of such testing.
Evidence visible
Verified by INCI list, which does not contain 'Parfum' or 'Fragrance'. The brand also explicitly states 'no added fragrance or perfume' and 'neutralized the smell with the use of multifunctional botanical extracts like witch hazel chamomile and more'.
Evidence visible
Verified by INCI list, which does not contain any colorants (e.g., CI numbers).
Missing
Verified by INCI list, which does not contain common essential oils. While Lavender Water and Tea Tree Leaf Water are present, these are hydrosols/distillates, not concentrated essential oils.
Evidence visible
Common ethical claim. No specific third-party certification (e.g., Leaping Bunny) is publicly visible to verify this claim.
Missing
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
No ingredient with a recognised endocrine-activity concern found in the database.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
No commonly-comedogenic ingredient found - a reasonable fit for acne-prone skin.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Declares 1 known allergen(s) (benzyl alcohol). Reactive skin should note these.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Uses milder (non-sulphate) surfactants.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Any proprietary 'complex' is broken down into its actual ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Brand makes a vegan / vegetarian claim.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
This is a safety claim that would typically be covered by extensive ingredient safety assessments and dermatological testing, which the brand states it conducts. However, specific finished product testing for carcinogenicity is not detailed.
This claim is often supported by in-vitro or in-vivo testing. The brand mentions clinical and dermatological testing, which could include non-comedogenicity assessments.
This claim is typically supported by patch testing on sensitive skin panels. The brand states 'Dermatologically Tested for Safety. Certified Non-irritant to Skin.' which is a strong indicator of such testing.
Verified by INCI list, which does not contain 'Parfum' or 'Fragrance'. The brand also explicitly states 'no added fragrance or perfume' and 'neutralized the smell with the use of multifunctional botanical extracts like witch hazel chamomile and more'.
Verified by INCI list, which does not contain any colorants (e.g., CI numbers).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
Brand states 'Clinical studies conducted on a panel of 35 volunteers at an external testing laboratory, Mascot Spincontrol Pvt. Ltd.' and 'clinically tested to provide instant hydration'.
Evidence visible
Brand states 'Dermatologically Tested for Safety. Certified Non-irritant to Skin.'. This implies third-party testing for safety.
Evidence visible
In India, cosmetics are licensed by CDSCO, not 'FDA Approved' in the same way drugs are. This claim uses language typically associated with drug approval, which is misleading for a cosmetic product without specific drug licensing details. No evidence of drug approval found.
Missing
This is a safety claim that would typically be covered by extensive ingredient safety assessments and dermatological testing, which the brand states it conducts. However, specific finished product testing for carcinogenicity is not detailed.
Evidence visible
This claim is often supported by in-vitro or in-vivo testing. The brand mentions clinical and dermatological testing, which could include non-comedogenicity assessments.
Evidence visible
This claim is typically supported by patch testing on sensitive skin panels. The brand states 'Dermatologically Tested for Safety. Certified Non-irritant to Skin.' which is a strong indicator of such testing.
Evidence visible
Verified by INCI list, which does not contain 'Parfum' or 'Fragrance'. The brand also explicitly states 'no added fragrance or perfume' and 'neutralized the smell with the use of multifunctional botanical extracts like witch hazel chamomile and more'.
Evidence visible
Verified by INCI list, which does not contain any colorants (e.g., CI numbers).
Missing
Verified by INCI list, which does not contain common essential oils. While Lavender Water and Tea Tree Leaf Water are present, these are hydrosols/distillates, not concentrated essential oils.
Evidence visible
Common ethical claim. No specific third-party certification (e.g., Leaping Bunny) is publicly visible to verify this claim.
Missing
“FDA Approved.”
Claim uses 'FDA Approved' which implies drug-like approval, but the product is a cosmetic. This crosses into drug boundary language without evidence of drug licensing.
“Carbon Neutral.”
Claim of 'Carbon Neutral' without publicly visible certification or methodology is an absolute environmental claim that requires substantiation.
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
