The numbers that hold up
In vivo, ISO 24444
Advanced Science Laboratories certificate, batch 11830, 15 subjects, dated 10 Apr 2023.
Independent test
MS Clinical Research, Bengaluru, commissioned by influencer Nitin Joshi, Oct 2025.
Claims verified
Fragrance free is verified; SPF 50 is verified with qualification. The rest are brand declared.
Need more evidence
PA++++, broad spectrum, photostable, acne safe, non-comedogenic, dermatologist tested, white cast free.
TConsumer facing summary
TCS status: Evidence Partially Available. The SPF claim has a named in vivo study and an independent third party test that both exceed SPF 50. Every other claim rests on brand statements with no public documents.
What this sunscreen claims
SPF 50, PA++++, broad spectrum, photostable, acne safe, non-comedogenic, fragrance free, white cast free, dermatologist patch tested, multi-vitamin skin repair
What we could verify
SPF 50 is supported at claim level by two public data points: ISO 24444:2019 in vivo SPF 56.6 on 15 subjects, batch 11830 (Advanced Science Laboratories certificate dated 10 Apr 2023, assessed by TCS), and an influencer-funded test (Oct 2025) reporting SPF 78.54
What we could not verify
PA++++ (no UVA-PF or method disclosed), broad spectrum (no critical wavelength), photostability, non-comedogenic, acne safe, dermatologist testing details, formula-to-test batch match
What testing evidence exists
ISO 24444:2019 in vivo SPF certificate, Advanced Science Laboratories, Inc., New York (study no. MS22.SPF.A1015.UPPL.ISO24444.ST15.REP.REV, batch 11830, 15 subjects, dated 10 Apr 2023); third party SPF test by MS Clinical Research, Bengaluru, commissioned by Nitin Joshi. Full reports with subject data not seen
What consumers commonly report
Lightweight, no white cast, good value, fragrance free. Minority report oiliness, breakouts, mild eye sting and slow absorption
Who the brand says it is for
Dry/normal, oily/combination, sensitive and acne prone skin; age 16+
Who evidence suggests it may suit
NA. No skin type specific testing is public. Consumer reports lean positive for normal to dry skin; mixed for oily and fungal acne prone skin
Important cautions
Brand advises avoiding during pregnancy and lactation (octocrylene). Contains linoleic/linolenic acid and PEG-100 stearate, commonly flagged for fungal acne. Not water or sweat resistant. Brand global page still lists Vitamin A although retinol is absent from the current INCI
AProduct identity
Product name
Multi-Vitamin SPF 50 (marketplaces: SPF 50 PA++++ Sunscreen with Multi-Vitamin)
Brand
Minimalist (Uprising Science Pvt Ltd; 90.5% acquired by Hindustan Unilever, announced 22 Jan 2025)
Product variant
SPF 50 PA++++
Product format
Cream (brand: “moisturiser-meets-sunscreen”, lotion-like)
Pack size
30 g, 50 g, 100 g
MRP
Brand site selling price: Rs 224 (30 g), Rs 359 (50 g), Rs 629 (100 g). Printed MRP: NA
Country of manufacture
India
Markets where sold
India; international via global.beminimalist.co (USD 9.99, shown sold out); Bangladesh reseller listing seen
Manufacturer
Uprising Science Pvt Ltd (brand page: “Manufactured & Marketed by”)
Manufacturing facility
F-2109, RIICO Industrial Area, Ramchandrapura, Jaipur 302022, Rajasthan (address on brand page; whether own plant or contract facility: NA)
Brand website URL
beminimalist.co
Product page URL
beminimalist.co/products/multi-vitamin-spf-50
Marketplace links
Nykaa, Amazon.in, Zepto, Smytten, Cureka
Date record created
29 Sep 2026
Date last checked
29 Sep 2026
B1Full ingredient list
Current list as shown on the brand product page (29 Sep 2026):
Water/Aqua, Octocrylene, Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane, Isododecane, Niacinamide, Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride, Arachidyl Alcohol, Titanium Dioxide, Propylene Glycol Dicaprylate/Dicaprate, Diisopropyl Sebacate, Ethylhexyl Triazone, Diisopropyl Adipate, C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate, Butylene Glycol, Allantoin, Panthenol, Sodium Hyaluronate, Linoleic Acid, Linolenic Acid, Behenyl Alcohol, Arachidyl Glucoside, Phenoxyethanol, Glyceryl Stearate, PEG-100 Stearate, Hydroxyethyl Acrylate/Sodium Acryloyldimethyl Taurate Copolymer, Tocopheryl Acetate, Acacia Senegal Gum, Xanthan Gum, Ethylhexylglycerin, Silica, Trisodium Ethylenediamine Disuccinate
Ingredient source
Brand website
Date checked
29 Sep 2026
B2UV filter system
UV filters present
Octocrylene; Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane (Avobenzone); Ethylhexyl Triazone (Uvinul T 150); Titanium Dioxide
Concentrations publicly disclosed
No
Declared concentrations
NA
Filter system
Hybrid (3 organic + 1 mineral)
Zinc Oxide present
No
Titanium Dioxide present
Yes
Nano UV filters disclosed
Unknown (TiO2 particle size not declared)
Fragrance present
No (brand claims fragrance free; no parfum in INCI)
Alcohol present
No ethanol / denatured alcohol. Fatty alcohols present (arachidyl, behenyl)
Fragrance allergens declared
None declared
Ingredients for additional safety assessment
Octocrylene (brand itself advises avoiding in pregnancy and lactation; benzophenone degradation question in aged product). Avobenzone photostability depends on octocrylene pairing. Linoleic acid, linolenic acid, glyceryl stearate, PEG-100 stearate flagged by third party tools as not fungal acne safe
CProtection claims
SPF claimed on pack
SPF 50
SPF claimed online
SPF 50
Pack and online consistent
YES
SPF claim type
SPF 50
PA rating claimed
PA++++
UVA-PF disclosed
NA
Broad spectrum claimed
Yes
Critical wavelength disclosed
NA
UVB protection claim
“Laboratory-confirmed SPF 50 protection”
UVB communicated primarily through SPF
Yes
Water resistance claimed
No
Sweat resistance claimed
No
Photostable claimed
Yes (“Photostable & Acne safe sunscreen”)
Blue light protection claimed
No
Infrared protection claimed
No
Visible light protection claimed
No
Pollution protection claimed
No
Other protection claims
Multi-vitamins (B3, B5, E, F) to “repair skin and minimise damage caused by UV exposure”; global page and marketplace titles reference reducing photoaging and Vitamin A
D1SPF test
| Field | Brand test | Independent test (Oct 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| SPF testing conducted | Yes | Yes |
| Report available | Publicly available: 1 page lab certificate published on the brand product page; assessed by TCS 29 Sep 2026. Full report with per-subject data not public | Results posted publicly by influencer Nitin Joshi; full report not assessed |
| Testing method | In vivo, ISO 24444:2019 incl. Amendment 1 (2022-03); static conditions | Reported as ISO 24443 and COLIPA 2011 (these are in vitro methods; exact SPF method NA) |
| Laboratory | Advanced Science Laboratories, Inc., 216 Congers Road, Bldg. 1, New City, New York 10956, USA. Principal Investigator: Marcin Skolik, M.Sc. Sponsor: Uprising Science Pvt Ltd | MS Clinical Research Pvt Ltd, Bengaluru |
| Laboratory accreditation | ISO 9001 certified quality system (SAI Global mark on certificate). ISO/IEC 17025 lab accreditation: NA | NA |
| Test date | Certificate dated 10 Apr 2023. Test execution date NA | NA |
| Report number | Study No. MS22.SPF.A1015.UPPL.ISO24444.ST15.REP.REV; Lab No. A-1015. Page footer reads MS22.SPF.A1015.UPPL.ISO24444.ST15.ADD.REV2 | NA |
| Batch tested | Batch No. 11830 (product named “Minimalist SPF 50 Sunscreen, PA ++++”) | NA |
| Number of subjects | 15 | NA |
| Measured SPF | Mean SPF 56.6 (confidence interval and SD not shown) | 78.54 |
| Labelled SPF | 50 | 50 |
| Result supports claim | Yes, for batch 11830 | Yes (on reported figure) |
| TCS evidence status | Document assessed | Public claim only |
- —The certificate covers SPF only. PA++++ appears in the product name but no UVA-PF result or method is on it.
- —Tested product is named “Minimalist SPF 50 Sunscreen”, not “Multi-Vitamin”. Link between batch 11830 and the current INCI is unconfirmed.
- —Two document numbers on one page: header ends REP.REV, footer ends ADD.REV2.
- —The lab's own footer states that when its report supports a commercial claim, the sponsor should provide the report in its entirety.
- —ISO 9001 is a quality management certification, not a testing competence accreditation (ISO/IEC 17025).
D2UVA test
UVA testing conducted
Unknown (PA++++ stated, no UVA method disclosed)
Method / Laboratory / Date / Batch
NA
UVA-PF result
NA
PA rating supported
NA
Critical wavelength
NA
Evidence supports claim
NA
Evidence status
Public claim only
D3–D7Other tests
| Test | Conducted | Method / Result | Evidence available |
|---|---|---|---|
| Photostability | Unknown (claimed, no test cited) | NA | No |
| Water resistance | Not claimed | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Stability (accelerated / real time) | Unknown | Shelf life 24 months declared; duration, temperatures, results NA | No |
| Microbiological / preservative efficacy | Unknown | NA | No |
| Packaging compatibility | Unknown | NA | No |
EClaims evidence audit
| # | Exact claim | Where | Evidence type | Product specific | Strength | TCS assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SPF 50 (“SPF value obtained: 56.6”) | Website, marketplaces | In vivo ISO 24444 lab certificate (batch 11830, n=15) + independent test | Yes | Moderate | Verified with qualification |
| 2 | PA++++ | Website, marketplaces | No evidence identified | NA | None | Evidence missing |
| 3 | Broad spectrum | Website | No evidence identified | NA | None | Evidence missing |
| 4 | Photostable | Website | No evidence identified (filter combination is plausible) | No | Weak | Evidence missing |
| 5 | Acne safe | Website | No evidence identified | No | None | Evidence missing |
| 6 | Non-comedogenic | Website | No evidence identified | No | None | Evidence missing |
| 7 | Fragrance free | Website | INCI (no parfum) | Yes | Strong | Verified |
| 8 | White cast free | Website, marketplace titles | Consumer reports only | Yes | Moderate | Under assessment |
| 9 | Vitamins “repair skin and minimise damage caused by UV exposure” | Website | Ingredient level research only | No | Weak | Not verified |
| 10 | Contains Vitamin A / reduces photoaging | Global site, marketplace titles | INCI no longer lists retinol | No | None | Not verified |
| 11 | Dermatologist patch tested | Website | Brand declaration | NA | Weak | Evidence missing |
Notes: evidence strength reflects public material only. Nothing has been submitted to TCS.
FDermatological and safety testing
Dermatologist tested claimed
Yes (“evaluated for safety through patch testing under the supervision of a Dermatologist”)
Evidence available
Brand declaration only
Test type / participants / duration
NA
Dermatologists involved / role
NA / supervision stated
Population tested / adverse reactions / conclusion
NA
Evidence supports claim
NA
Patch test conducted
Yes (brand declared)
HRIPT conducted
Unknown
Sample size / results
NA
Sensitive skin claimed
Yes
Sensitive skin supporting test
No (none public)
Sensitive skin TCS status
Unknown
Non-comedogenic claimed
Yes
Non-comedogenic testing / method / result
No / NA / NA
Non-comedogenic evidence status
Public claim only
GConsumer studies
No consumer study is published. All fields NA: study source, sample size, participant profile, duration, design, questions, results, percentage claims, statistical analysis, TCS assessment.
HFormula history and traceability
The formula has changed at least once. An INCI list captured on INCIDecoder in Oct 2021 included Retinol, Polysorbate 20 and Polyacrylate Crosspolymer-6, none of which appear in the current brand list. Ingredient order also differs.
Current formula launch date
NA
Last known formula update
NA
Previous formulation exists
Yes
Known changes
Retinol (Vitamin A), Polysorbate 20, Polyacrylate Crosspolymer-6 removed; order of emollients and filters revised. Global site copy still says Vitamin A
Retested after reformulation
Unknown
Test batch number
11830 (SPF certificate, 10 Apr 2023)
Current commercial batch number
NA
Test batch linked to production
Unknown
Tested formula matches formula sold
NA
Manufacturer changed after testing
Unknown (ownership moved to HUL in 2025)
Facility changed after testing
Unknown
UV filter supplier changed
Unknown
IManufacturing quality
Manufacturer name
Uprising Science Pvt Ltd
Facility location
RIICO Industrial Area, Ramchandrapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan
GMP evidence available
Unknown
GMP standard
NA
Certificate validity
NA
Batch traceability available
NA
Finished product COA
NA
Raw material COAs
NA
Change control procedure
Unknown
JConsumer experience
Based on marketplace feedback and a small number of blog posts. Experience only, not protection.
Texture
Lightweight, creamy lotion
Finish
Mixed: natural to dewy on normal/dry skin; some report semi-matte, some report oily
White cast
None to mild (occasional brief cast that settles in minutes)
Pilling
Rarely (one commenter notes others report it; humidity and base layer dependent)
Eye sting
Sometimes (mild irritation reported in a minority)
Greasy feel
Reported by some oily skin users
Drying feel
No meaningful reports
Fragrance perception
None (fragrance free)
Spreadability
Spreads easily; takes 1 to 2 minutes to absorb
Makeup compatibility
NA
Reapplication experience
NA
KSkin type suitability
Brand says suitable for
Dry/normal, oily/combination, sensitive, acne prone skin. Age 16+. Not recommended in pregnancy or lactation
Supported by evidence for
NA
Evidence type
NA
Frequently liked by
Normal to dry skin; budget and fragrance-free seekers
Frequently disliked by
Some oily and breakout-prone users (oiliness, breakouts)
Recurring skin type concerns
Oiliness in humid conditions; fungal acne ingredients flagged by third party tools
LInfluencer content analysis
Thin sample: Instagram and YouTube were not systematically assessed.
Items sampled
2 (Nitin Joshi SPF test, Oct 2025; PeppyBlog post, Feb 2022, updated Oct 2022)
Sources
News coverage of Instagram post; independent blog
Paid partnership disclosed
No (Joshi self-funded the Rs 2.15 lakh test; PeppyBlog shows no sponsorship)
Gifted product disclosed
Unknown
Overall sentiment
Mixed
Most common positives
Passed SPF test (78.54); no white cast; easy spread; no breakouts
Most common complaints
PeppyBlog rated 2/5 over avobenzone stability and endocrine concerns; mild sting on peeling skin; dewy finish
Factual claims repeated without evidence
Hormone-disruption concern about filters (PeppyBlog), not substantiated in the blog post
Claims requiring verification
Lab method behind the 78.54 figure (reported methods are in vitro) and whether MS Clinical Research is accredited; creator commentary alleged a conflict of interest in the test set (unverified)
MReddit and community sentiment
Three threads were analysed: r/IndianSkincareAddicts “Is Minimalist SPF 50 actually overrated? These skin type scores are concerning” (48 comments shown, 18 upvotes, posted approximately 7 months before this record) and “Minimalist Sunscreen Review” (53 comments shown, 110 upvotes, posted approximately 4 years before this record); and “Does Minimalist SPF 50 sunscreen really works?” (107 comments shown, 38 upvotes, posted approximately 5 years before this record, subreddit not shown in the capture reviewed). Findings below are drawn from the comments visible in the capture, not every reply in each thread.
Caution: all three threads also discuss other Minimalist sunscreens sold alongside the Multi-Vitamin SPF 50, including an SPF 60 variant, a sunscreen stick, and Minimalist Light Fluid Sunscreen. Comments that did not name a specific variant are excluded below.
Overall sentiment (SPF 50 Multi-Vitamin comments)
Mixed, skewed negative on texture and application
Most common positives
No breakouts reported by several commenters; no white cast reported by several commenters with lighter skin; well liked in cooler, drier weather; called budget friendly
Most common complaints
Pilling, raised in nearly every thread and the single most repeated complaint; eye stinging or irritation; greasy or sweaty feel in heat and humidity; occasional breakouts reported by some commenters; one commenter with darker skin reported a visible cast
Water or sweat resistance
One commenter noted it is “not sweat or water resistant,” consistent with this record's Section C finding
Retinol
Multiple commenters in the two older threads (4 to 5 years before this record) state the SPF 50 variant contains retinol, and one links an INCIDecoder page. This is consistent with Section H: an Oct 2021 INCI capture included retinol, which is absent from the current brand-listed INCI. These comments predate the reformulation and cannot be assumed to describe the current formula
Third-party rating cited in-thread
One commenter linked a site (ryfoya.com) rating “Minimalist SPF 50 Sunscreen” at approximately 45% for oily, dry and combination skin and approximately 25% for sensitive skin, citing irritation, eye stinging and retinol content. Other commenters in the same thread disputed the site's credibility. TCS has not assessed ryfoya.com's methodology or data
Shift toward a different SKU
In the more recent thread (7 months before this record), most replies redirect from the SPF 50 Multi-Vitamin to recommending Minimalist Light Fluid Sunscreen instead, a separate product not covered by this record
TCS assessment
Treated as unverified consumer reports, the same reliability tier as the marketplace feedback in Section N. Individual account authenticity and any undisclosed sponsorship could not be checked
NMarketplace feedback analysis
| Marketplace | Rating | Ratings | Date range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nykaa | 4.3 / 5 | 164,667 ratings | May 2022 to Aug 2026 |
| Brand site (India) | 3.9 / 5 | 2,070 | NA |
| Brand site (global) | 3.9 / 5 (68% recommend) | 355 | NA |
| GoPicky | 3.8 / 5 | 6 | NA |
| Skinsort | 2.3 / 5 | NA | NA |
| Amazon.in | NA | NA | NA |
| Theme | Finding |
|---|---|
| Common positives | Lightweight, no white cast, fragrance free, budget friendly, non greasy for many |
| Common negatives | Oiliness or breakouts for some, quantity for price, slow absorption, mild eye irritation |
| Protection failure complaints | NA |
| Formula change complaints | NA |
| Texture complaints | Dewy rather than matte (minority) |
| Packaging complaints | NA |
OEvidence gaps
- —SPF full report not available (certificate only; per-subject data, CI and addendum unseen)
- —UVA test not available
- —PA evidence unavailable
- —Photostability evidence unavailable
- —Stability data unavailable
- —Formula version unknown (reformulated after Oct 2021)
- —Test batch unknown
- —Current formula match unknown
- —GMP evidence unavailable
- —Dermatologist tested evidence unavailable
- —Sensitive skin evidence unavailable
- —Non comedogenic evidence unavailable
- —Consumer study unavailable
- —Ingredient concentrations unavailable
- —UV filter concentrations unavailable
- —Formula update history unavailable
- —Other: nano status of TiO2; SPF lab identity and accreditation; Reddit sentiment
Water resistance is not claimed, so that gap does not apply. Manufacturer name is available; facility certification is not.
QTCS evidence classification
| Claim | Classification |
|---|---|
| SPF 50 | Document assessed (lab certificate, batch 11830; full report not seen) |
| PA++++ | Publicly claimed |
| Broad spectrum | Publicly claimed |
| Photostable | Publicly claimed |
| Acne safe / non-comedogenic | Publicly claimed |
| Fragrance free | TCS inferred (from INCI) |
| White cast free | Consumer reported |
| Dermatologist patch tested | Brand declared |
| Suitable for sensitive skin | Brand declared |
RFinal sunscreen proof summary
| Area | Status |
|---|---|
| SPF evidence | Partial |
| UVA evidence | Unknown |
| Broad spectrum evidence | Unknown |
| Water resistance evidence | Not applicable |
| Photostability evidence | Unknown |
| Formula to test traceability | Not confirmed |
| Current commercial formula match | Unknown |
| Manufacturing evidence | Not verified |
- —Claims assessed: 11
- —Claims verified: 1 (fragrance free); 1 verified with qualification (SPF 50)
- —Claims not verified: 2 (vitamin repair; Vitamin A / photoaging)
- —Claims requiring more evidence: 7 (PA++++, broad spectrum, photostable, acne safe, non-comedogenic, dermatologist tested, white cast free)
- —Major evidence gaps: UVA-PF and critical wavelength; full SPF report and the ADD.REV2 addendum; confirmation that batch 11830 matches the current (retinol-free) INCI; GMP certificate
SOverall TCS status
Evidence Partially Available.
Related
This evidence record audits public claims. For the full 5-pillar ingredient safety scorecard on this product, see the brand analysis.
Want to verify your sunscreen to The Clean Sheet’s standard? Reach out: hello@thecleansheet.in · Instagram · LinkedIn