CODESKINSerums

Hyaluronic 7+ Serum

A multi-weight hyaluronic acid serum with several advanced hydration and barrier actives. The public ingredient list shows four distinct forms of hyaluronic acid, though the brand's claim of seven types cannot be fully confirmed from the published list as it stands. More significantly, the ingredient list includes Whey Protein, which is derived from dairy, while the product page states 100% vegan. This is a direct contradiction between two publicly available pieces of information from the same brand website, and consumers relying on the vegan claim should be aware of it. The formula also contains a penetration enhancer (Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether) that increases how deeply all co-formulated ingredients absorb, which is not disclosed on the product page.

Hyaluronic 7+ Serum
MOSTLYCLEAN
Mostly Clean
Best for
  • Dry skin
  • Dehydrated Skin
  • Combination skin
Avoid if
  • Clinical Claim Not Verified
  • Active % Not Verified

₹500-₹1,250 • Analysed 10 June 2026

India Context

Multi-weight HA serums perform differently in humid versus dry climates. In India's humid monsoon conditions, lighter lower-molecular-weight HA forms work better for texture and feel. The Transcutol (penetration enhancer) in this formula increases absorption of niacinamide and other actives, which is an efficacy benefit but is especially relevant for consumers stacking other active serums. The Whey Protein ingredient and vegan claim contradiction should be resolved by the brand before purchase decisions are made by consumers with dairy allergies or ethical vegan requirements.

This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.

At a glance

Alcohol free
Paraben free
Dermatologist tested
Vegan

What was checked

Fair
100% veganNot found

Whey Protein, a dairy-derived ingredient, is listed in the public ingredient list on the same brand website that carries the 100% vegan claim. This is a direct public evidence contradiction. Consumers with dairy allergies or ethical vegan requirements should be aware.

Not found
7 types of Hyaluronic AcidNeeds context

Four distinct HA forms are clearly identifiable in the ingredient list. The remaining three types claimed cannot be independently confirmed from the public ingredient list without additional brand disclosure.

Brand claim
5% NiacinamideNeeds context

The brand states 5% niacinamide and the ingredient list position is consistent with a working concentration, but the percentage is not confirmed on the main product page in a way that is independently verifiable.

Brand claim
Tripeptide-85 for firmnessNot found

Tripeptide-85 appears in the marketing copy on the product page but is not present in the published ingredient list. A claim referencing an ingredient that is not listed cannot be verified from public evidence.

Not found
Dermatologist testedVerified

A dermatologist test report is published on the brand website, which is more evidence than badge-only claims.

Published evidence
Verified: confirmed from public evidenceSupported: consistent with available evidenceNeeds context: relevant for some usersNot verified: could not be confirmed

The breakdown

Needs proof

Public Evidence Score across 5 pillars. Open any row for the full rationale.

Ingredient Safety
Strong

The full ingredient list is publicly available.

The full ingredient list is publicly available. No banned substances are identified under EU cosmetics law, India's cosmetic regulations, Health Canada's restricted list, the Korean MFDS database, or the EU's list of substances of very high concern. The formula uses a phenoxyethanol-free preservation system of Caprylhydroxamic Acid, 1,2-Hexanediol, Sodium Benzoate, Potassium Sorbate, Sodium Levulinate, and Levulinic Acid, which is consistent with the brand's declared ingredient charter. Two ingredients require consumer awareness. Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether (also known as Transcutol) is a penetration enhancer that significantly increases how deeply all co-formulated ingredients absorb into the skin. This amplifies both the efficacy and the systemic exposure of the whole formula. Consumers stacking other active serums should factor this in. Phenethyl Alcohol is used as a preservation booster and has mild sensitisation potential at higher concentrations, with a rose-like scent profile that some consumers may experience as fragrance. Whey Protein is present in the ingredient list and is dairy-derived, which contradicts the 100% vegan claim on the product page.

Formula Logic
Strong

Water is listed first.

Water is listed first. Propanediol appears second, indicating a significant solvent load. This is common in high-performance serums and helps solubilise actives, but it also means the formula is solvent-heavy before the actives begin. Caprylhydroxamic Acid and 1,2-Hexanediol appear unusually early in the list for preservation-system ingredients. This INCI positioning may reflect a formula design where these multifunctional ingredients serve both a humectant and preservation role. Niacinamide appears fifth, likely above the 1% threshold, consistent with the brand's stated 5% concentration. Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether (Transcutol) appears later in the list as a penetration enhancer that increases absorption of all co-formulated actives. Ceramide NP appears very late in the list, suggesting a trace concentration. Without published concentration data, barrier repair claims based on Ceramide NP alone are difficult to verify from the ingredient list. Linolenic Acid near the end of the list is oxidation-sensitive and may need robust preservation in this water-based vehicle.

Claims Evidence
Fair

Three public evidence issues are identified.

Three public evidence issues are identified. First, the 100% vegan claim on the product page is directly contradicted by Whey Protein (dairy-derived) in the ingredient list. Both pieces of information come from the same brand website. This is a publicly visible contradiction and consumers with dairy concerns or ethical veganism should be aware of it. The brand should clarify and reconcile this publicly. Second, Tripeptide-85 for firmness appears in marketing copy on the product page but Tripeptide-85 does not appear in the published ingredient list. A cosmetic claim based on an ingredient that is not listed is not supported from public evidence. Third, the 7 types of Hyaluronic Acid claim: four distinct HA forms are clearly identifiable in the ingredient list (Sodium Hyaluronate Crosspolymer, Sodium Hyaluronate, Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid, Sodium Acetylated Hyaluronate). Additional HA types may be present within marine algae extracts or Glycogen, but this cannot be confirmed without brand disclosure. The dermatologist test report is published, which is a positive. The 5% niacinamide concentration is plausible from ingredient list order but not formally confirmed.

Test Transparency
Grade BGood

The full ingredient list is publicly accessible on the brand website.

The full ingredient list is publicly accessible on the brand website. A dermatologist test report is published, which earns partial Grade B credit. However, the vegan certification and the ingredient list contain directly conflicting information that the brand has not publicly resolved. This reduces overall transparency significantly. The Tripeptide-85 marketing claim without a corresponding INCI entry is a further transparency gap. No disclosure is given to consumers about the penetration enhancer (Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether) and its effect on absorption depth. No batch or expiry traceability is publicly visible. No preservative efficacy test result is publicly accessible.

Consumer Clarity
Good

Basic application instructions are provided on the product page.

Basic application instructions are provided on the product page. Hydration and plumping suitability guidance is communicated. However, consumers are not told about the penetration enhancer in the formula and its effect on how deeply all actives are absorbed. This is a meaningful gap, particularly for consumers layering multiple active serums. No allergy or dairy-sensitivity warning is provided despite Whey Protein being present in a formula marketed as vegan. No guidance is given on managing layering with exfoliant or retinoid serums.

Ingredient list

Strong
SafeNoteCaution
Ingredient
Aqua
Propanediol
Caprylhydroxamic Acid
1,2-Hexanediol
Niacinamide
Hexylene Glycol
Glycerin
Saccharide Isomerate
Citric Acid
Sodium Citrate
Heptyl Glucoside
Hypnea Musciformis Extract
Sargassum Filipendula Extract
Sodium Benzoate
Potassium Sorbate
Sodium Hyaluronate Crosspolymer
Glycogen
Panthenol
Butylene Glycol
Polyglutamic Acid
Phenethyl Alcohol
Sodium Carrageenan
Jania Rubens Extract
Sclerotium Gum
Hydroxypropyl Tetrahydropyrantriol
Pentylene Glycol
Zinc Ricinoleate
Tetrasodium Glutamate Diacetate
Levulinic Acid
Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
Hydrogenated Lecithin
Phytosteryl/Octyldodecyl Lauroyl Glutamate
Ceramide NP
Sodium Hyaluronate
Aminomethyl Propanol
Trisodium Dicarboxymethyl Alaninate
Allantoin
Whey Protein
Ectoin
Maltodextrin
Biosaccharide Gum-1
Xanthan Gum
Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid
Magnesium Carboxymethyl Beta-Glucan
Sodium Acetylated Hyaluronate
Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether
Linolenic Acid

INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).

Regulatory screen

Clear
EU 1223/2009EU Cosmetics Regulation - Annexes II–VI

No obvious public red flag found

India CR 2020India Cosmetics Rules, CDSCO

No obvious public red flag found

Health Canada HotlistCanada prohibited & restricted ingredients

No obvious public red flag found

US FDA 21 CFRUS FDA Parts 700–740

No obvious public red flag found

MFDS KoreaKorea Cosmetics Act

No obvious public red flag found

ECHA SVHCSubstances of Very High Concern

No obvious public red flag found

IARCCarcinogen classifications Groups 1/2A/2B

No obvious carcinogenicity flag found

AICIS AustraliaAustralian industrial chemical safety

No obvious public red flag found

TGA AustraliaTherapeutic claims (if applicable)

Not triggered

Canada NHPIDNatural health product ingredients

Not triggered

Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.

Claims checked

Fair
100% veganNot publicly supported

Whey Protein, a dairy-derived ingredient, is listed in the public ingredient list on the same brand website that carries the 100% vegan claim. This is a direct public evidence contradiction. Consumers with dairy allergies or ethical vegan requirements should be aware.

Missing

7 types of Hyaluronic AcidNeeds proof

Four distinct HA forms are clearly identifiable in the ingredient list. The remaining three types claimed cannot be independently confirmed from the public ingredient list without additional brand disclosure.

Mentioned only

5% NiacinamideNeeds proof

The brand states 5% niacinamide and the ingredient list position is consistent with a working concentration, but the percentage is not confirmed on the main product page in a way that is independently verifiable.

Mentioned only

Tripeptide-85 for firmnessNot publicly supported

Tripeptide-85 appears in the marketing copy on the product page but is not present in the published ingredient list. A claim referencing an ingredient that is not listed cannot be verified from public evidence.

Missing

Dermatologist testedPublicly supported

A dermatologist test report is published on the brand website, which is more evidence than badge-only claims.

Evidence visible

What would strengthen this review

Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps

  • The brand should publicly resolve the contradiction between Whey Protein in the ingredient list and the 100% vegan claim on the product page. This affects consumers with dairy allergies and those purchasing on ethical grounds.
  • Tripeptide-85 appears in marketing copy but not in the published ingredient list. The brand should either add it to the INCI if present, or remove the marketing claim.
  • Niacinamide concentration should be confirmed explicitly on the product page rather than inferred from ingredient list order.
  • The presence of Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether (a penetration enhancer that increases absorption depth of all co-formulated actives) should be disclosed clearly to consumers who are stacking active serums.
  • No preservative efficacy test result (ISO 11930) is publicly accessible. Challenge test data would confirm the multi-component preservation system is adequate for this water-based formula.
  • Ceramide NP concentration is not disclosed. Given its late position in the ingredient list, the functional barrier repair dose cannot be verified from public information alone.
About this review

This assessment is based only on publicly available INCI, claims, and test evidence. It is not a full Clean Sheet certification. Full certification requires confidential formula review, exact concentrations, supplier documentation, manufacturing records, packaging compatibility, preservative efficacy, stability, and complete claim validation.

Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.

Independent reviewPublic evidence only
Full methodology
  • What global regulations say about each ingredient
  • What toxicology evidence shows at cosmetic concentrations
  • What formula concentration context changes
  • What the product format and leave-on contact time changes
  • What the stated user group needs
  • What published test evidence confirms
  • What the brand is claiming vs what evidence supports

More from CodeSkin

See all
Back to CodeSkin
WhatsApp Community

Join The Clean Sheet™ community

Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.

Join for free →