Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →CodeSkin UltraProtect Fluid Sunscreen delivers robust, well-evidenced SPF 100 PA++++ protection with advanced filters, but its ambitious time-bound claims and 'fragrance-free' positioning are not fully supported by public evidence or ingredient reality.
₹499 • Analysed 18 July 2026
India sees high UV year-round, so daily broad-spectrum protection (UVA/PA rating included) matters more here than the SPF number alone; reapply through the day in direct sun. The price is consistent across the brand's direct channels and partner Clinikally, with a slight discount offered on Clinikally. The 50ml variant is priced at Rs.500, which is competitive for a high-SPF, new-generation filter sunscreen. The 30ml variant on JOJO SHOP is proportionally more expensive per ml. 4 marketing claims could draw ASCI scrutiny under India's advertising code; the ingredient list is the more reliable guide.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
A published SPF test report is accessible on the brand website, confirming testing was conducted. The SPF 100 value is unusually high, and no standardised ISO method above SPF 50+ is publicly confirmed, but the report provides more evidence than most Indian sunscreens.
Supported by the presence of five new-generation UV filters in the INCI, covering different wavelength ranges with photostability. The published SPF test report also supports this.
The brand references a French clinical study, but the full study, including method, subject count, setting, and result scope, is not publicly accessible and cannot be verified from available public evidence.
LipoShield® is a proprietary ingredient complex. While ingredients generally have research, no finished product study specific to this product's blue light and IR protection claims is publicly visible.
The brand states that non-comedogenic, dermatologist tested, ophthalmologist tested, water and sweat resistance, and moisturisation all have corresponding test reports in the brand's Proof of the Code section. This implies a finished product test for cosmetic feel.
A study summary is provided: 'The sunscreen was applied twice daily for three days on 32 women aged 18–40 years with normal eye conditions. Eye examinations found no irritation, redness, dryness, or discomfort. The study concluded the product is safe and comfortable for the eye area.'
The brand states that non-comedogenic claims have corresponding test reports in the brand's Proof of the Code section.
Niacinamide appears fairly early in the ingredient list, suggesting a meaningful concentration. Polyglutamic Acid is also present. These ingredients have general research supporting barrier repair, but no finished product study for this specific claim is publicly visible.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against the label.
Screened against the ingredient database (32 of 55 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
No ingredient with a recognised endocrine-activity concern found in the database.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Declares 1 known allergen(s) (benzyl alcohol). Reactive skin should note these.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Any proprietary 'complex' is broken down into its actual ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Brand makes a vegan / vegetarian claim.
Sustainability & Ethics
Brand makes a cruelty-free / PETA claim.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Aqua |
Dibutyl Adipate |
Methylene Bis-Benzotriazolyl Tetramethylbutylphenol |
C15-19 Alkane |
Caprylyl Caprylate/Caprate |
Ethylhexyl Triazone |
Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate |
Polyglyceryl-6 Laurate |
Niacinamide |
Chondrus Crispus Extract |
Dicaprylyl Carbonate |
Isododecane |
Tetrahexyldecyl Ascorbate |
Adenosine |
Sodium Hyaluronate |
Hexylene Glycol |
Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice |
Saccharomyces Ferment Lysate Filtrate |
Glycerin |
Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine |
Starch |
Polymethylsilsesquioxane |
Isoamyl Laurate |
Diethylhexyl Butamido Triazone |
Xylitol |
Steareth-21 |
Pentaerythrityl Distearate |
Sodium Polyacrylate |
Erythritol |
Sodium Stearoyl Glutamate |
Silica |
Polyglutamic Acid |
Magnesium Aluminum Silicate |
Polyacrylate Crosspolymer-6 |
Brassica Oleracea Italica (Broccoli) Extract |
Glyceryl Caprylate |
Trisodium Dicarboxymethyl Alaninate |
Tocopheryl Acetate |
Tocotrienols |
Phytosteryl/Octyldodecyl Lauroyl Glutamate |
Diethylhexyl Syringylidenemalonate |
Benzyl Alcohol |
Olea Europaea (Olive) Leaf Extract |
Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate |
Ectoin |
Sodium Levulinate |
Panthenol |
Caprylyl/Capryl Glucoside |
Decyl Glucoside |
Xanthan Gum |
Myristyl Glucoside |
Citric Acid |
Cymbopogon Flexuosus Leaf Oil |
Potassium Sorbate |
Sodium Benzoate |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
Benzyl Alcohol and Cymbopogon Flexuosus Leaf Oil are EU-listed fragrance allergens.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified. INCI is publicly available and appears in correct order.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
Methylene Bis-Benzotriazolyl Tetramethylbutylphenol, Ethylhexyl Triazone, Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate, Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine, Diethylhexyl Butamido Triazone are not FDA-approved UV filters for sale in the US.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“Clinically proven in a French study to provide up to 12 hours of sun protection”
Quantified claim ('12 hours') without publicly verifiable study details.
“Fragrance-free, vegan, and cruelty-free”
The 'fragrance-free' claim is misleading due to the presence of natural fragrance allergens (Benzyl Alcohol, Cymbopogon Flexuosus Leaf Oil) which are not declared as allergens.
“All Skin Types”
Claiming 'all skin types' for a product containing known fragrance allergens without specific mildness testing for those with sensitivities.
“24-hour hydration”
Quantified claim ('24-hour hydration') without publicly verifiable study details.
A published SPF test report is accessible on the brand website, confirming testing was conducted. The SPF 100 value is unusually high, and no standardised ISO method above SPF 50+ is publicly confirmed, but the report provides more evidence than most Indian sunscreens.
Evidence visible
Supported by the presence of five new-generation UV filters in the INCI, covering different wavelength ranges with photostability. The published SPF test report also supports this.
Evidence visible
The brand references a French clinical study, but the full study, including method, subject count, setting, and result scope, is not publicly accessible and cannot be verified from available public evidence.
Missing
LipoShield® is a proprietary ingredient complex. While ingredients generally have research, no finished product study specific to this product's blue light and IR protection claims is publicly visible.
Mentioned only
The brand states that non-comedogenic, dermatologist tested, ophthalmologist tested, water and sweat resistance, and moisturisation all have corresponding test reports in the brand's Proof of the Code section. This implies a finished product test for cosmetic feel.
Evidence visible
A study summary is provided: 'The sunscreen was applied twice daily for three days on 32 women aged 18–40 years with normal eye conditions. Eye examinations found no irritation, redness, dryness, or discomfort. The study concluded the product is safe and comfortable for the eye area.'
Evidence visible
The brand states that non-comedogenic claims have corresponding test reports in the brand's Proof of the Code section.
Evidence visible
Niacinamide appears fairly early in the ingredient list, suggesting a meaningful concentration. Polyglutamic Acid is also present. These ingredients have general research supporting barrier repair, but no finished product study for this specific claim is publicly visible.
Mentioned only
These ingredients are present in the INCI and have general research supporting pigmentation fading. However, their position in the INCI (Tetrahexyldecyl Ascorbate is after Isododecane, Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate is after Olea Europaea Leaf Extract) suggests they may be at lower concentrations. No finished product study for this specific claim is publicly visible.
Mentioned only
Ectoin is present in the INCI and has general research supporting protection against environmental stress. No finished product study for this specific claim is publicly visible.
Mentioned only
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Declares 1 known allergen(s) (benzyl alcohol). Reactive skin should note these.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Any proprietary 'complex' is broken down into its actual ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Brand makes a vegan / vegetarian claim.
Sustainability & Ethics
Brand makes a cruelty-free / PETA claim.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
The brand references a French clinical study, but the full study, including method, subject count, setting, and result scope, is not publicly accessible and cannot be verified from available public evidence.
LipoShield® is a proprietary ingredient complex. While ingredients generally have research, no finished product study specific to this product's blue light and IR protection claims is publicly visible.
The brand states that non-comedogenic, dermatologist tested, ophthalmologist tested, water and sweat resistance, and moisturisation all have corresponding test reports in the brand's Proof of the Code section. This implies a finished product test for cosmetic feel.
A study summary is provided: 'The sunscreen was applied twice daily for three days on 32 women aged 18–40 years with normal eye conditions. Eye examinations found no irritation, redness, dryness, or discomfort. The study concluded the product is safe and comfortable for the eye area.'
The brand states that non-comedogenic claims have corresponding test reports in the brand's Proof of the Code section.
Niacinamide appears fairly early in the ingredient list, suggesting a meaningful concentration. Polyglutamic Acid is also present. These ingredients have general research supporting barrier repair, but no finished product study for this specific claim is publicly visible.
Benzyl Alcohol and Cymbopogon Flexuosus Leaf Oil are EU-listed fragrance allergens.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified. INCI is publicly available and appears in correct order.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
Methylene Bis-Benzotriazolyl Tetramethylbutylphenol, Ethylhexyl Triazone, Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate, Bis-Ethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine, Diethylhexyl Butamido Triazone are not FDA-approved UV filters for sale in the US.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified.
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
A published SPF test report is accessible on the brand website, confirming testing was conducted. The SPF 100 value is unusually high, and no standardised ISO method above SPF 50+ is publicly confirmed, but the report provides more evidence than most Indian sunscreens.
Evidence visible
Supported by the presence of five new-generation UV filters in the INCI, covering different wavelength ranges with photostability. The published SPF test report also supports this.
Evidence visible
The brand references a French clinical study, but the full study, including method, subject count, setting, and result scope, is not publicly accessible and cannot be verified from available public evidence.
Missing
LipoShield® is a proprietary ingredient complex. While ingredients generally have research, no finished product study specific to this product's blue light and IR protection claims is publicly visible.
Mentioned only
The brand states that non-comedogenic, dermatologist tested, ophthalmologist tested, water and sweat resistance, and moisturisation all have corresponding test reports in the brand's Proof of the Code section. This implies a finished product test for cosmetic feel.
Evidence visible
A study summary is provided: 'The sunscreen was applied twice daily for three days on 32 women aged 18–40 years with normal eye conditions. Eye examinations found no irritation, redness, dryness, or discomfort. The study concluded the product is safe and comfortable for the eye area.'
Evidence visible
The brand states that non-comedogenic claims have corresponding test reports in the brand's Proof of the Code section.
Evidence visible
Niacinamide appears fairly early in the ingredient list, suggesting a meaningful concentration. Polyglutamic Acid is also present. These ingredients have general research supporting barrier repair, but no finished product study for this specific claim is publicly visible.
Mentioned only
These ingredients are present in the INCI and have general research supporting pigmentation fading. However, their position in the INCI (Tetrahexyldecyl Ascorbate is after Isododecane, Dipotassium Glycyrrhizate is after Olea Europaea Leaf Extract) suggests they may be at lower concentrations. No finished product study for this specific claim is publicly visible.
Mentioned only
Ectoin is present in the INCI and has general research supporting protection against environmental stress. No finished product study for this specific claim is publicly visible.
Mentioned only
“Clinically proven in a French study to provide up to 12 hours of sun protection”
Quantified claim ('12 hours') without publicly verifiable study details.
“Fragrance-free, vegan, and cruelty-free”
The 'fragrance-free' claim is misleading due to the presence of natural fragrance allergens (Benzyl Alcohol, Cymbopogon Flexuosus Leaf Oil) which are not declared as allergens.
“All Skin Types”
Claiming 'all skin types' for a product containing known fragrance allergens without specific mildness testing for those with sensitivities.
“24-hour hydration”
Quantified claim ('24-hour hydration') without publicly verifiable study details.
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps