Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
Simple's Protecting Light Moisturiser SPF 15 delivers on its promise of gentle hydration and basic sun protection for sensitive skin, but consumers should stick to official brand information to avoid misleading claims found on some third-party platforms.
₹364 • Analysed 18 July 2026
In India's warm, humid climate a lighter leave-on layer tends to wear more comfortably; how it feels can shift between air-conditioned indoors and humid outdoors. The product is consistently priced at its MRP of Rs.499 on the brand's website and Flipkart. However, quick commerce platforms like Zepto and Swiggy Instamart offer significant discounts, making it more affordable there. 3 marketing claims could draw ASCI scrutiny under India's advertising code; the ingredient list is the more reliable guide.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
Brand states '12-hour moisturisation' on its website and other listings. This implies finished product testing, but no specific study details (method, sample size, duration) are publicly visible.
The INCI lists multiple UV filters (Ethylhexyl Salicylate, Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane, Phenylbenzimidazole Sulfonic Acid, Octocrylene) at concentrations that support SPF 15. DailyMed lists specific percentages for some filters.
The presence of both UVA (Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane/Avobenzone) and UVB (Ethylhexyl Salicylate, Phenylbenzimidazole Sulfonic Acid, Octocrylene) filters supports broad-spectrum protection.
Brand states 'Dermatologically tested' on its official website and product listings, indicating finished product testing.
Brand states 'non-comodegenic' on its official website and product listings, implying finished product testing.
Brand states 'hypoallergenic' on its official website and product listings, implying finished product testing.
The retrieved INCI list does not contain 'Parfum', 'Fragrance', or common artificial colorants. The claim 'no harsh chemicals' is subjective but supported by the absence of common irritants like drying alcohols or strong essential oils.
Supported by 'Dermatologically tested', 'non-comedogenic', 'hypoallergenic', and 'no artificial perfume/colour' claims, implying suitability testing for sensitive skin.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against the label.
Brand describes ingredient origin in its claims.
Screened against the ingredient database (19 of 26 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
No ingredient with a recognised endocrine-activity concern found in the database.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
No commonly-comedogenic ingredient found - a reasonable fit for acne-prone skin.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
No EU-declarable or database-flagged allergen found in the list.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Active percentages are disclosed for the hero ingredient(s).
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
No retinoid or other pregnancy-cautioned active found in the screen.
Sustainability & Ethics
Brand references recyclable / PCR packaging.
Brand makes a cruelty-free / PETA claim.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Aqua |
Ethylhexyl Salicylate |
Glycerin |
Stearic Acid |
Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane |
Phenylbenzimidazole Sulfonic Acid |
Glycol Stearate |
Octocrylene |
PEG-100 Stearate |
Dimethicone |
Allantoin |
BHT |
Bisabolol |
Caprylyl Glycol |
Carbomer |
Cetyl Alcohol |
Disodium EDTA |
Glyceryl Stearate |
Panthenol |
Phenoxyethanol |
Potassium Carbonate |
Potassium Hydroxide |
Sodium Hydroxide |
Stearamide AMP |
Tocopheryl Acetate |
Xanthan Gum |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“chemical free and natural skin care products provider in India”
The term 'chemical free' is scientifically inaccurate and misleading, as all substances are chemicals. This claim is likely to mislead consumers.
“13 HR MOISTURISATION”
Contradicts the brand's primary '12-hour moisturisation' claim without additional evidence.
“Enriched with Vitamin E, Pro Vitamin B5 and Borage Oil”
Claiming 'Borage Oil' when it is not present in the official INCI list is misleading.
Brand states '12-hour moisturisation' on its website and other listings. This implies finished product testing, but no specific study details (method, sample size, duration) are publicly visible.
Evidence visible
The INCI lists multiple UV filters (Ethylhexyl Salicylate, Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane, Phenylbenzimidazole Sulfonic Acid, Octocrylene) at concentrations that support SPF 15. DailyMed lists specific percentages for some filters.
Mentioned only
The presence of both UVA (Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane/Avobenzone) and UVB (Ethylhexyl Salicylate, Phenylbenzimidazole Sulfonic Acid, Octocrylene) filters supports broad-spectrum protection.
Mentioned only
Brand states 'Dermatologically tested' on its official website and product listings, indicating finished product testing.
Evidence visible
Brand states 'non-comodegenic' on its official website and product listings, implying finished product testing.
Evidence visible
Brand states 'hypoallergenic' on its official website and product listings, implying finished product testing.
Evidence visible
The retrieved INCI list does not contain 'Parfum', 'Fragrance', or common artificial colorants. The claim 'no harsh chemicals' is subjective but supported by the absence of common irritants like drying alcohols or strong essential oils.
Mentioned only
Supported by 'Dermatologically tested', 'non-comedogenic', 'hypoallergenic', and 'no artificial perfume/colour' claims, implying suitability testing for sensitive skin.
Evidence visible
The claim about 'light formula' is subjective but consistent with product type. 'Eco-friendly recycled packaging' is a brand statement, but no specific certification or details on the recycling process are provided.
Missing
Brand statement. No third-party verification or specific details on the recycling process are publicly visible.
Missing
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
No ingredient with a recognised endocrine-activity concern found in the database.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
No commonly-comedogenic ingredient found - a reasonable fit for acne-prone skin.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
No EU-declarable or database-flagged allergen found in the list.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Active percentages are disclosed for the hero ingredient(s).
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
No retinoid or other pregnancy-cautioned active found in the screen.
Sustainability & Ethics
Brand references recyclable / PCR packaging.
Brand makes a cruelty-free / PETA claim.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
Brand states 'Dermatologically tested' on its official website and product listings, indicating finished product testing.
Brand states 'non-comodegenic' on its official website and product listings, implying finished product testing.
Brand states 'hypoallergenic' on its official website and product listings, implying finished product testing.
The retrieved INCI list does not contain 'Parfum', 'Fragrance', or common artificial colorants. The claim 'no harsh chemicals' is subjective but supported by the absence of common irritants like drying alcohols or strong essential oils.
Supported by 'Dermatologically tested', 'non-comedogenic', 'hypoallergenic', and 'no artificial perfume/colour' claims, implying suitability testing for sensitive skin.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
Brand states '12-hour moisturisation' on its website and other listings. This implies finished product testing, but no specific study details (method, sample size, duration) are publicly visible.
Evidence visible
The INCI lists multiple UV filters (Ethylhexyl Salicylate, Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane, Phenylbenzimidazole Sulfonic Acid, Octocrylene) at concentrations that support SPF 15. DailyMed lists specific percentages for some filters.
Mentioned only
The presence of both UVA (Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane/Avobenzone) and UVB (Ethylhexyl Salicylate, Phenylbenzimidazole Sulfonic Acid, Octocrylene) filters supports broad-spectrum protection.
Mentioned only
Brand states 'Dermatologically tested' on its official website and product listings, indicating finished product testing.
Evidence visible
Brand states 'non-comodegenic' on its official website and product listings, implying finished product testing.
Evidence visible
Brand states 'hypoallergenic' on its official website and product listings, implying finished product testing.
Evidence visible
The retrieved INCI list does not contain 'Parfum', 'Fragrance', or common artificial colorants. The claim 'no harsh chemicals' is subjective but supported by the absence of common irritants like drying alcohols or strong essential oils.
Mentioned only
Supported by 'Dermatologically tested', 'non-comedogenic', 'hypoallergenic', and 'no artificial perfume/colour' claims, implying suitability testing for sensitive skin.
Evidence visible
The claim about 'light formula' is subjective but consistent with product type. 'Eco-friendly recycled packaging' is a brand statement, but no specific certification or details on the recycling process are provided.
Missing
Brand statement. No third-party verification or specific details on the recycling process are publicly visible.
Missing
“chemical free and natural skin care products provider in India”
The term 'chemical free' is scientifically inaccurate and misleading, as all substances are chemicals. This claim is likely to mislead consumers.
“13 HR MOISTURISATION”
Contradicts the brand's primary '12-hour moisturisation' claim without additional evidence.
“Enriched with Vitamin E, Pro Vitamin B5 and Borage Oil”
Claiming 'Borage Oil' when it is not present in the official INCI list is misleading.
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
