Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
This serum packs a powerful blend of hair growth actives, but its ambitious quantified claims outrun the publicly visible finished-product evidence, requiring consumers to manage expectations beyond ingredient-level promises.
₹799 • Analysed 10 August 2026
This hair growth serum is positioned in the premium segment for the Indian market, with a price point reflecting its blend of patented active complexes. While the formula contains well-regarded ingredients for hair health, the brand's quantified claims (e.g., 'reduces hair fall by 60%') lack publicly visible finished-product clinical evidence, which could attract ASCI scrutiny. The water-based, non-greasy formula is well-suited for the humid Indian climate, preventing a heavy or sticky feel on the scalp.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
The claim relies on ingredient-level research for actives like Redensyl, Anagain, Procapil, Baicapil, and Aminexil. No finished product clinical study details are publicly visible to support this claim for the specific formulation.
The claim relies on ingredient-level research for actives. No finished product clinical study details are publicly visible to support this claim for the specific formulation.
The INCI list confirms the presence of components of Redensyl, Anagain, Procapil, Baicapil, and Aminexil. Their high placement in the INCI suggests meaningful concentrations.
This claim refers to the clinical backing of the individual active ingredients, not the finished product formulation. No finished product clinical study details are publicly visible.
The water-based formula with humectants and no heavy oils high in the INCI supports this claim.
This is a design feature of the product, directly observable and functional.
No specific testing for suitability across genders is publicly visible, though the ingredients are generally considered suitable for both.
The brand states the product is dermatologically tested, but no details of the testing (e.g., methodology, sample size, results) are publicly visible.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against INCIDecoder.
Screened against the ingredient database (21 of 46 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
No ingredient with a recognised endocrine-activity concern found in the database.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Declares 2 known allergen(s) (Rosmarinus Officinalis (Rosemary) Leaf Extract, Ci 19140). Reactive skin should note these.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Any proprietary 'complex' is broken down into its actual ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Aqua |
Propanediol |
Butylene Glycol |
Propylene Glycol |
Glycerin |
Aqua |
Sodium Metabisulfite |
Larix Europaea Wood Extract |
Glycine |
Zinc Chloride |
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract (Redensyl) |
Rosmarinus Officinalis (Rosemary) Leaf Extract |
Trigonella Foenum-Graecum (Fenugreek) Seed Extract |
Diaminopyrimidine Oxide (Aminexil) |
Pisum Sativum (Pea) Sprout Extract |
Phenoxyethanol |
Sodium Benzoate |
Aqua (Anagain) |
Butylene Glycol |
Aqua |
PPG-26-Buteth-26 |
PEG-40 Hydrogenated Castor Oil |
Apigenin |
Oleanolic Acid |
Biotinoyl Tripeptide-1 (Procapil) |
Phenoxyethanol |
Ethylhexylglycerin |
Red Clover Extract |
D-Panthenol |
Glycerin |
Moringa Oleifera (Moringa) Leaf Extract |
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid |
Propanediol |
Aqua |
Arginine |
Lactic Acid |
Glycine Soja (Soybean) Germ Extract |
Triticum Vulgare (Wheat) Germ Extract |
Scutellaria Baicalensis Root Extract |
Sodium Benzoate |
Gluconolactone |
Calcium Gluconate (Baicapil) |
Serenoa Serrulata (Saw Palmetto) Fruit Extract |
Fragrance |
Ci 19140 |
Ci 42090 |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
“Clinically Proven Actives / Clinically Proven Ingredients / Clinically Proven”
The claim 'Clinically Proven' without specifying 'ingredients' or providing finished product study details can mislead consumers into believing the entire product is clinically proven.
“No Harmful Chemicals”
The term 'No Harmful Chemicals' is vague and can be misleading, as it implies some chemicals are inherently harmful without context.
“Visible results in 90 days / Visible Results in 3 Months”
Quantified time-bound claims require a published, verifiable study for the finished product to be compliant with ASCI guidelines.
“Reduces hair fall by 60%”
Quantified claims require a published, verifiable study for the finished product to be compliant with ASCI guidelines.
“Increases hair growth by 20%”
Quantified claims require a published, verifiable study for the finished product to be compliant with ASCI guidelines.
“Boosts hair density by 15%”
Quantified claims require a published, verifiable study for the finished product to be compliant with ASCI guidelines.
The claim relies on ingredient-level research for actives like Redensyl, Anagain, Procapil, Baicapil, and Aminexil. No finished product clinical study details are publicly visible to support this claim for the specific formulation.
Mentioned only
The claim relies on ingredient-level research for actives. No finished product clinical study details are publicly visible to support this claim for the specific formulation.
Mentioned only
The INCI list confirms the presence of components of Redensyl, Anagain, Procapil, Baicapil, and Aminexil. Their high placement in the INCI suggests meaningful concentrations.
Mentioned only
This claim refers to the clinical backing of the individual active ingredients, not the finished product formulation. No finished product clinical study details are publicly visible.
Mentioned only
The water-based formula with humectants and no heavy oils high in the INCI supports this claim.
Mentioned only
This is a design feature of the product, directly observable and functional.
Evidence visible
No specific testing for suitability across genders is publicly visible, though the ingredients are generally considered suitable for both.
Missing
The brand states the product is dermatologically tested, but no details of the testing (e.g., methodology, sample size, results) are publicly visible.
Evidence visible
This is a vague and subjective claim. All cosmetic ingredients are chemicals, and 'harmful' is not defined. No specific evidence is provided.
Missing
The retrieved INCI list does not contain parabens, sulphates (common cleansing agents), or silicones (e.g., dimethicone, cyclomethicone).
Evidence visible
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
Declares 2 known allergen(s) (Rosmarinus Officinalis (Rosemary) Leaf Extract, Ci 19140). Reactive skin should note these.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Any proprietary 'complex' is broken down into its actual ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
The INCI list confirms the presence of components of Redensyl, Anagain, Procapil, Baicapil, and Aminexil. Their high placement in the INCI suggests meaningful concentrations.
This claim refers to the clinical backing of the individual active ingredients, not the finished product formulation. No finished product clinical study details are publicly visible.
The water-based formula with humectants and no heavy oils high in the INCI supports this claim.
This is a design feature of the product, directly observable and functional.
No specific testing for suitability across genders is publicly visible, though the ingredients are generally considered suitable for both.
The brand states the product is dermatologically tested, but no details of the testing (e.g., methodology, sample size, results) are publicly visible.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
The claim relies on ingredient-level research for actives like Redensyl, Anagain, Procapil, Baicapil, and Aminexil. No finished product clinical study details are publicly visible to support this claim for the specific formulation.
Mentioned only
The claim relies on ingredient-level research for actives. No finished product clinical study details are publicly visible to support this claim for the specific formulation.
Mentioned only
The INCI list confirms the presence of components of Redensyl, Anagain, Procapil, Baicapil, and Aminexil. Their high placement in the INCI suggests meaningful concentrations.
Mentioned only
This claim refers to the clinical backing of the individual active ingredients, not the finished product formulation. No finished product clinical study details are publicly visible.
Mentioned only
The water-based formula with humectants and no heavy oils high in the INCI supports this claim.
Mentioned only
This is a design feature of the product, directly observable and functional.
Evidence visible
No specific testing for suitability across genders is publicly visible, though the ingredients are generally considered suitable for both.
Missing
The brand states the product is dermatologically tested, but no details of the testing (e.g., methodology, sample size, results) are publicly visible.
Evidence visible
This is a vague and subjective claim. All cosmetic ingredients are chemicals, and 'harmful' is not defined. No specific evidence is provided.
Missing
The retrieved INCI list does not contain parabens, sulphates (common cleansing agents), or silicones (e.g., dimethicone, cyclomethicone).
Evidence visible
“Clinically Proven Actives / Clinically Proven Ingredients / Clinically Proven”
The claim 'Clinically Proven' without specifying 'ingredients' or providing finished product study details can mislead consumers into believing the entire product is clinically proven.
“No Harmful Chemicals”
The term 'No Harmful Chemicals' is vague and can be misleading, as it implies some chemicals are inherently harmful without context.
“Visible results in 90 days / Visible Results in 3 Months”
Quantified time-bound claims require a published, verifiable study for the finished product to be compliant with ASCI guidelines.
“Reduces hair fall by 60%”
Quantified claims require a published, verifiable study for the finished product to be compliant with ASCI guidelines.
“Increases hair growth by 20%”
Quantified claims require a published, verifiable study for the finished product to be compliant with ASCI guidelines.
“Boosts hair density by 15%”
Quantified claims require a published, verifiable study for the finished product to be compliant with ASCI guidelines.
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
