Getting you a comprehensive review of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
This sunscreen offers a strong formula for daily protection, but the brand needs to enhance public transparency around its performance claims with detailed study results.
₹750 • Analysed 15 August 2026
This Vilvah Sunscreen SPF 50 PA++++ is positioned as a premium daily sunscreen at Rs. 750 for 50g (Rs. 15/g). Its formula, featuring modern UV filters, Niacinamide, and a blend of ceramides and antioxidants, is well-suited for the high UV and often humid Indian climate, offering broad-spectrum protection without a white cast. While the brand claims 'Dermatologically Tested' and 'Water Resistant,' detailed clinical study reports for these and 'Blue Light/Pollution Protection' are not publicly visible, which is a common transparency gap in the Indian market but warrants consumer caution for ambitious claims.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to review, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
Brand states SPF 50 PA++++, which is a summary of a required test. However, no detailed clinical study report (sample size, methodology, duration) is publicly visible to substantiate this quantified claim.
The presence of multiple modern organic and mineral UV filters (Uvinul A Plus, Uvinul T 150, Tinosorb S, Titanium Dioxide) high in the INCI supports broad-spectrum protection, tied to SPF/PA testing.
Formula contains modern organic UV filters and micronized Titanium Dioxide, along with light emollients (C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate) and film formers, supporting a lightweight, non-greasy feel and minimal white cast.
The INCI lists multiple humectants and hydrators such as Glycerin, Sodium Hyaluronate, Betaine, D-Panthenol, and Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Extract, supporting the hydrating claim.
Brand states 'in-vitro' and 'in-vivo' testing for blue light protection, but no specific details, methodology, or results are publicly visible. Ingredients like Ectoin and various antioxidants offer general protection but do not specifically prove this claim for the finished product.
Brand states 'in-vitro' and 'in-vivo' testing for pollution protection, but no specific details, methodology, or results are publicly visible. Ingredients like Biosaccharide Gum-4 and antioxidants offer general protection but do not specifically prove this claim for the finished product.
Brand states 'Water Resistant', which is a summary of a required test. However, no detailed clinical study report (e.g., 40 or 80 minutes, methodology) is publicly visible to substantiate this claim.
Brand states 'Dermatologically Tested'. This indicates testing was performed, but no specific report details (sample size, method, population) are publicly visible.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against INCIDecoder.
Screened against the ingredient database (27 of 43 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
No ingredient with a recognised endocrine-activity concern found in the database.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
No EU-declarable or database-flagged allergen found in the list.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Brand makes a vegan / vegetarian claim.
Sustainability & Ethics
Brand makes a cruelty-free / PETA claim.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Aqua |
Glycerin |
Diethylamino Hydroxybenzoyl Hexyl Benzoate |
Ethylhexyl Triazone |
Bisethylhexyloxyphenol Methoxyphenyl Triazine |
Titanium Dioxide |
Propanediol |
C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate |
Sodium Polyacrylate |
Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil |
Phospholipids |
Xylitol |
Caprylic Acid |
Glyceryl Stearate |
Niacinamide |
Sodium Hyaluronate |
Betaine |
D-Panthenol |
Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Extract |
Thermus Thermophillus Ferment |
Phenoxyethanol |
Ethylhexylglycerin |
Biosaccharide Gum-4 |
Bisabolol |
Tocopheryl Acetate |
1,2-Hexanediol |
Ceramide AP |
Ceramide AS |
Ceramide EOP |
Ceramide NG |
Ceramide NP |
Ceramide NS |
Cetyl-PG Hydroxyethyl Palmitamide |
Cholesterol |
Hydrogenated Lecithin |
Laminaria Digitata Extract |
Ectoin |
Camellia Sinensis Leaf Extract |
Oryza Sativa (Rice) Extract |
Morus Alba Root Extract |
Allantoin |
Tapioca Starch |
Disodium EDTA |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
Brand states SPF 50 PA++++, which is a summary of a required test. However, no detailed clinical study report (sample size, methodology, duration) is publicly visible to substantiate this quantified claim.
Evidence visible
The presence of multiple modern organic and mineral UV filters (Uvinul A Plus, Uvinul T 150, Tinosorb S, Titanium Dioxide) high in the INCI supports broad-spectrum protection, tied to SPF/PA testing.
Evidence visible
Formula contains modern organic UV filters and micronized Titanium Dioxide, along with light emollients (C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate) and film formers, supporting a lightweight, non-greasy feel and minimal white cast.
Mentioned only
The INCI lists multiple humectants and hydrators such as Glycerin, Sodium Hyaluronate, Betaine, D-Panthenol, and Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Extract, supporting the hydrating claim.
Mentioned only
Brand states 'in-vitro' and 'in-vivo' testing for blue light protection, but no specific details, methodology, or results are publicly visible. Ingredients like Ectoin and various antioxidants offer general protection but do not specifically prove this claim for the finished product.
Missing
Brand states 'in-vitro' and 'in-vivo' testing for pollution protection, but no specific details, methodology, or results are publicly visible. Ingredients like Biosaccharide Gum-4 and antioxidants offer general protection but do not specifically prove this claim for the finished product.
Missing
Brand states 'Water Resistant', which is a summary of a required test. However, no detailed clinical study report (e.g., 40 or 80 minutes, methodology) is publicly visible to substantiate this claim.
Evidence visible
Brand states 'Dermatologically Tested'. This indicates testing was performed, but no specific report details (sample size, method, population) are publicly visible.
Evidence visible
Brand states 'Non-comedogenic'. This indicates testing was performed, but no specific report details are publicly visible.
Evidence visible
The fragrance-free and alcohol-free formula, along with soothing ingredients, supports broad suitability for various skin types, including sensitive skin.
Mentioned only
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This review evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
No EU-declarable or database-flagged allergen found in the list.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Brand claims dermatologist testing (claim stated; underlying report not seen).
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
Brand makes a vegan / vegetarian claim.
Sustainability & Ethics
Brand makes a cruelty-free / PETA claim.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
The INCI lists multiple humectants and hydrators such as Glycerin, Sodium Hyaluronate, Betaine, D-Panthenol, and Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Extract, supporting the hydrating claim.
Brand states 'in-vitro' and 'in-vivo' testing for blue light protection, but no specific details, methodology, or results are publicly visible. Ingredients like Ectoin and various antioxidants offer general protection but do not specifically prove this claim for the finished product.
Brand states 'in-vitro' and 'in-vivo' testing for pollution protection, but no specific details, methodology, or results are publicly visible. Ingredients like Biosaccharide Gum-4 and antioxidants offer general protection but do not specifically prove this claim for the finished product.
Brand states 'Water Resistant', which is a summary of a required test. However, no detailed clinical study report (e.g., 40 or 80 minutes, methodology) is publicly visible to substantiate this claim.
Brand states 'Dermatologically Tested'. This indicates testing was performed, but no specific report details (sample size, method, population) are publicly visible.
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
Brand states SPF 50 PA++++, which is a summary of a required test. However, no detailed clinical study report (sample size, methodology, duration) is publicly visible to substantiate this quantified claim.
Evidence visible
The presence of multiple modern organic and mineral UV filters (Uvinul A Plus, Uvinul T 150, Tinosorb S, Titanium Dioxide) high in the INCI supports broad-spectrum protection, tied to SPF/PA testing.
Evidence visible
Formula contains modern organic UV filters and micronized Titanium Dioxide, along with light emollients (C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate) and film formers, supporting a lightweight, non-greasy feel and minimal white cast.
Mentioned only
The INCI lists multiple humectants and hydrators such as Glycerin, Sodium Hyaluronate, Betaine, D-Panthenol, and Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Extract, supporting the hydrating claim.
Mentioned only
Brand states 'in-vitro' and 'in-vivo' testing for blue light protection, but no specific details, methodology, or results are publicly visible. Ingredients like Ectoin and various antioxidants offer general protection but do not specifically prove this claim for the finished product.
Missing
Brand states 'in-vitro' and 'in-vivo' testing for pollution protection, but no specific details, methodology, or results are publicly visible. Ingredients like Biosaccharide Gum-4 and antioxidants offer general protection but do not specifically prove this claim for the finished product.
Missing
Brand states 'Water Resistant', which is a summary of a required test. However, no detailed clinical study report (e.g., 40 or 80 minutes, methodology) is publicly visible to substantiate this claim.
Evidence visible
Brand states 'Dermatologically Tested'. This indicates testing was performed, but no specific report details (sample size, method, population) are publicly visible.
Evidence visible
Brand states 'Non-comedogenic'. This indicates testing was performed, but no specific report details are publicly visible.
Evidence visible
The fragrance-free and alcohol-free formula, along with soothing ingredients, supports broad suitability for various skin types, including sensitive skin.
Mentioned only
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
