Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Getting you a comprehensive analysis of the product
Reading every ingredient in the formula…
Join The Clean Sheet™ community
Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.
Join for free →
WishCare's Barrier Bounce Moisturizer offers a solid, gentle formula for barrier support and hydration, but its marketing claims outrun the publicly visible evidence, especially regarding active concentrations and clinical backing.
₹335 • Analysed 23 October 2026
This WishCare moisturizer is positioned as an affordable barrier repair solution, which is highly relevant for Indian consumers prone to environmental stressors and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation. Its lightweight, non-greasy, and fragrance-free formula is well-suited for India's often hot and humid climate, addressing concerns about heaviness or pore-clogging. While the brand makes strong claims about an 'optimal 3:1:1 ratio' and 'clinically-backed' benefits, the lack of specific finished-product clinical studies for this product means consumers should manage expectations, as these claims currently rely on ingredient-level evidence. The ASCI concern regarding 'clinically-backed' claims without visible proof is relevant for the Indian advertising landscape.
Independent and free. The Clean Sheet takes no money from brands to analyse, rank, or approve a product. This is a web evidence analysis, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of analysis.
Ceramides, cholesterol, and fatty acids are known to support skin barrier function (ingredient-level evidence). No finished-product clinical study for this specific product is publicly visible to confirm the extent of barrier restoration.
The formula is fragrance-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, sulphate-free, and mineral oil-free, which generally suits dry and sensitive skin.
Ceramide NP, Ceramide AP, Ceramide EOS, and Vigna Radiata (Mung Bean) Extract are listed in the INCI.
The INCI lists ceramides, cholesterol, and fatty acids. While the 3:1:1 ratio is a recognized optimal ratio for barrier repair (ingredient-level evidence), the actual concentration of these key lipids is likely low as they appear after phenoxyethanol in the INCI. No finished-product evidence confirms this 'optimal' ratio's efficacy in this specific formula.
Ingredients like ceramides, cholesterol, fatty acids, and humectants (glycerin, pentylene glycol) are known to help prevent moisture loss (ingredient-level evidence). No finished-product TEWL (Transepidermal Water Loss) study is publicly visible for this product.
Humectants and emollients in the formula support hydration (ingredient-level evidence). No finished-product hydration study with a specified duration is publicly visible.
This is a subjective sensory claim, widely supported by user reviews across platforms.
This is a subjective sensory claim, widely supported by user reviews across platforms.
What we could confirm from public sources and the verified ingredient list.
Ingredient Safety & Toxicity
Full ingredient list retrieved and verified against the label.
Brand describes ingredient origin in its claims.
Screened against the ingredient database (19 of 29 ingredients matched); no cosmetics-prohibited ingredient found.
No ingredient with a recognised endocrine-activity concern found in the database.
No IARC-classified or formaldehyde-releasing ingredient found in the database screen.
No commonly-comedogenic ingredient found - a reasonable fit for acne-prone skin.
Irritation & Allergen Risk
No EU-declarable or database-flagged allergen found in the list.
No high-sensitisation preservative (MI/MCI/formaldehyde-releaser) from our screen was found.
Ingredient Transparency
The full INCI list is publicly available, not just hero ingredients.
Any proprietary 'complex' is broken down into its actual ingredients.
Ingredients are listed in the descending order required by India Cosmetics Rules 2020.
Standards & Compliance
Usage warnings and directions are clear on the label.
No retinoid or other pregnancy-cautioned active found in the screen.
Brand makes a vegan / vegetarian claim.
Screened against a curated reference set that we are continuing to verify and expand, so “clear” means no flag from that set, not a guarantee. Not a substitute for a full toxicological or clinical assessment.
| Ingredient |
|---|
Aqua |
Propylene Glycol |
Diethylhexyl Malate |
Glyceryl Stearate |
PEG Stearate |
Cetearyl Alcohol |
Ammonium Acryloyldimethyltaurate/VP Copolymer |
Alkyl Benzoate |
Isononyl Isononanoate |
Phenoxyethanol |
Ethylhexylglycerin |
Vigna Radiata (Mung Bean) Extract |
Niacinamide |
Clitoria Ternatea Flower Extract |
Cholesterol |
Sodium Polyacrylate |
Hydrogenated Polydecene |
Trideceth-10 |
Disodium EDTA |
Glycerin |
1,2-Hexanediol |
Pentylene Glycol |
Ceramide NP |
Glyceryl Stearate SE |
Phytosphingosine |
Ceramide AP |
Ceramide EOS |
Oligopeptide-1 |
Copper Tripeptide-1 |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
No prohibited or restricted ingredients identified
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance assessment.
“clinically-backed moisturizer”
The claim 'clinically-backed' implies robust scientific evidence, but no such evidence is provided for this specific product, making it potentially misleading under ASCI guidelines for substantiation of claims.
Ceramides, cholesterol, and fatty acids are known to support skin barrier function (ingredient-level evidence). No finished-product clinical study for this specific product is publicly visible to confirm the extent of barrier restoration.
Mentioned only
The formula is fragrance-free, alcohol-free, paraben-free, sulphate-free, and mineral oil-free, which generally suits dry and sensitive skin.
Mentioned only
Ceramide NP, Ceramide AP, Ceramide EOS, and Vigna Radiata (Mung Bean) Extract are listed in the INCI.
Mentioned only
The INCI lists ceramides, cholesterol, and fatty acids. While the 3:1:1 ratio is a recognized optimal ratio for barrier repair (ingredient-level evidence), the actual concentration of these key lipids is likely low as they appear after phenoxyethanol in the INCI. No finished-product evidence confirms this 'optimal' ratio's efficacy in this specific formula.
Mentioned only
Ingredients like ceramides, cholesterol, fatty acids, and humectants (glycerin, pentylene glycol) are known to help prevent moisture loss (ingredient-level evidence). No finished-product TEWL (Transepidermal Water Loss) study is publicly visible for this product.
Mentioned only
Humectants and emollients in the formula support hydration (ingredient-level evidence). No finished-product hydration study with a specified duration is publicly visible.
Mentioned only
This is a subjective sensory claim, widely supported by user reviews across platforms.
Evidence visible
This is a subjective sensory claim, widely supported by user reviews across platforms.
Evidence visible
This is a subjective sensory claim, widely supported by user reviews across platforms.
Evidence visible
Oligopeptide-1, Hexapeptide-11, and Copper Tripeptide-1 (EGF peptides) are present in the INCI. Peptides are known for skin renewal properties (ingredient-level evidence). However, they appear very low in the INCI (after phenoxyethanol), suggesting low concentration. No finished-product evidence for 'boosting skin renewal' is publicly visible.
Mentioned only
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
This analysis evaluates brand claims against visible evidence and formula logic. It does not replace a full ingredient safety analysis or a clinical product test. Results vary by individual, and the consumer should always read the full ingredient list and follow usage guidance.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-analysis, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
