AQUALOGICASunscreens

Hydrate+ Dewy Sunscreen SPF 50 PA++++

Aqualogica's flagship hydrating sunscreen uses a hybrid mineral-chemical UV filter system combining Titanium Dioxide, Zinc Oxide, Avobenzone, Octinoxate, and Benzophenone-3 for broad-spectrum SPF 50 PA++++ coverage. Two of those chemical filters carry regulatory concern: Benzophenone-3 (Oxybenzone) is classified as a Category 1 endocrine disruptor by ECHA (2025), and Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate (Octinoxate) had its EU-permitted maximum reduced in 2023 over hormonal concern data. Both remain permitted in India and are applied in a product used daily across significant skin surface area. The mineral filters, Ceramide 11, Hyaluronic Acid, and Trehalose add genuine barrier and hydration benefit, and the formula is fragrance-free.

Hydrate+ Dewy Sunscreen SPF 50 PA++++
NEEDSPROOF
Needs Proof
Best for
  • Daily Use
  • Dry skin
  • Skincare beginners
Avoid if
  • Endocrine Disruptor Concern
  • Relying on the SPF claim without independent evidence

₹279 · ₹6/ml • Analysed 10 June 2026

India Context

PA++++ is essential for India's UV conditions, where UVA-driven post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation is a leading skin concern across Fitzpatrick III-V skin tones. The hybrid formula avoids the white cast that has historically discouraged daily sunscreen use in India. However, consumers who prefer to avoid Benzophenone-3 (Oxybenzone) given its 2025 ECHA Category 1 endocrine disruptor classification should note its presence alongside Octinoxate in this daily-use product. Reapplication every two hours under direct sun exposure is needed to maintain the stated SPF. The dewy finish may feel heavy for oily skin during India's humid summers.

This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.

At a glance

Fragrance free
Alcohol free
Paraben free
SPF verified

What was checked

Good
SPF 50Needs context

SPF 50 is stated on the product, but no ISO 24444-compliant test report with lab name, date, or result summary is publicly accessible to verify this figure.

Brand claim
PA++++ (highest UVA protection category)Needs context

PA++++ is a meaningful UVA protection claim that requires its own verified test; no publicly accessible UVA test report was found during research.

Brand claim
Fragrance-FreeVerified

No Parfum, Fragrance, or identifiable scent-use essential oils appear in the published INCI list; this claim is confirmed.

Published evidence
Coconut Water hydrationNeeds context

Coconut Water appears well down the ingredient list, indicating a supporting rather than primary hydrating concentration despite the prominent product naming.

Brand claim
Broad-spectrum sun protectionNeeds context

The UV filter combination covers UVA and UVB by design, but no publicly accessible broad-spectrum test report with a UVAPF ratio is linked from the brand.

Brand claim
Verified: confirmed from public evidenceSupported: consistent with available evidenceNeeds context: relevant for some usersNot verified: could not be confirmed

The breakdown

Needs proof

Public Evidence Score across 5 pillars. Open any row for the full rationale.

Ingredient Safety
Fair

Two UV filters in this formula carry hormonal disruption concerns based on public regulatory data.

Two UV filters in this formula carry hormonal disruption concerns based on public regulatory data. Benzophenone-3 (Oxybenzone) was classified as a Category 1 endocrine disruptor by ECHA in 2025, is under restriction review in the EU, and is banned in several marine-protected areas worldwide including Hawaii, Palau, and Aruba for documented coral reef toxicity. Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate (Octinoxate) is a separate UV filter whose permitted maximum in the EU was reduced in 2023 following updated endocrine disruption data. Having both in a daily-use leave-on product applied across large body surface areas is a meaningful stacking of hormonal-concern filters. Both are currently India-permitted. The mineral filters Titanium Dioxide and Zinc Oxide are inert and safe. No synthetic fragrance, no parabens, no formaldehyde releasers identified.

Formula Logic
Strong

The hybrid UV filter system is coverage-effective: Titanium Dioxide handles UVB and short UVA, Zinc Oxide extends to long UVA, Avobenzone covers the full UVA spectrum, and...

The hybrid UV filter system is coverage-effective: Titanium Dioxide handles UVB and short UVA, Zinc Oxide extends to long UVA, Avobenzone covers the full UVA spectrum, and Octinoxate adds UVB absorption. No dedicated next-generation photostabiliser is present, but the mineral filters provide some photostabilising effect on Avobenzone. Ceramide 11 adds genuine barrier value that is uncommon in sunscreens. Hyaluronic Acid, Trehalose, Xylitol, and Sodium Lactate build a layered hydration system. Coconut Water appears well down the ingredient list, suggesting it is a supporting rather than a primary hydrating base despite the product name. Active UV filter concentrations are not publicly disclosed.

Claims Evidence
Good

SPF 50 and PA++++ are clearly stated on the product.

SPF 50 and PA++++ are clearly stated on the product. The full INCI list is published on the brand website. However, no ISO 24444-compliant SPF test report is publicly accessible, which means the SPF 50 figure cannot be independently verified from public data. Active UV filter concentrations are not disclosed. The Coconut Water-first product name implies a primary hydrating role that the ingredient list does not support. The Benzophenone-3 presence is not acknowledged in any product communication. Fragrance-free status is confirmed by INCI and is publicly supported.

Test Transparency
Grade CFair

The brand states SPF 50 and PA++++ prominently.

The brand states SPF 50 and PA++++ prominently. However, no ISO 24444-compliant SPF test report is publicly accessible. No lab name, test date, batch, or result summary is linked or published anywhere on the brand website or associated Unilever channels found during research. PA++++ is a meaningful UVA claim that also requires verified testing. Aqualogica is a Hindustan Unilever brand, and internal testing almost certainly exists, but it is not in the public domain. The absence of a published test report is the norm for this category in India, so this is assigned Grade C.

Consumer Clarity
Strong

Clear application instructions are present, including the recommended amount and routine step.

Clear application instructions are present, including the recommended amount and routine step. Reapplication guidance for sun exposure is provided. Skin type suitability is stated. A warning about Oxybenzone for reef-conscious users is absent from product communications, which is a gap worth noting for informed consumer choice.

Ingredient list

Fair
SafeNoteCaution
Ingredient
Aqua
Titanium Dioxide
Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate
Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane
Benzophenone-3
Phospholipids
1,3 Butylene Glycol
Sodium Polyacrylate
Glycerin
Zinc Oxide
Xylitol
Caprylic Acid
Glyceryl Stearate
Dimethicone
Hyaluronic Acid
Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil
D-Alpha Tocopheryl Acetate
Ceramide 11
Cocos Nucifera (Coconut) Water
Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice
Sodium Lactate
Trehalose
Sodium Benzoate
E-Ascorbic Acid
Sodium Levulinate
Phenoxyethanol
Allantoin
Melanin

INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).

Regulatory screen

Review
EU 1223/2009EU Cosmetics Regulation - Annexes II–VI

Potential concern found - Benzophenone-3 (Oxybenzone, EU Annex VI restricted, under endocrine disruptor review); Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate (Octinoxate, EU Annex VI max reduced 2023)

India CR 2020India Cosmetics Rules, CDSCO

No obvious public red flag found

Health Canada HotlistCanada prohibited & restricted ingredients

No obvious public red flag found

US FDA 21 CFRUS FDA Parts 700–740

Potential concern found - Benzophenone-3 (Oxybenzone, FDA reviewing systemic absorption data)

MFDS KoreaKorea Cosmetics Act

Potential concern found - Benzophenone-3 (MFDS restricted UV filter); Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate (MFDS max 7.5%)

ECHA SVHCSubstances of Very High Concern

Potential concern found - Benzophenone-3 (Oxybenzone, ECHA Category 1 Endocrine Disruptor 2025)

IARCCarcinogen classifications Groups 1/2A/2B

No obvious carcinogenicity flag found

AICIS AustraliaAustralian industrial chemical safety

No obvious public red flag found

TGA AustraliaTherapeutic claims (if applicable)

Potential concern found - SPF 50 claim requires TGA-compliant testing documentation if marketed in Australia

Canada NHPIDNatural health product ingredients

Not triggered

Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.

Claims checked

Good
SPF 50Needs proof

SPF 50 is stated on the product, but no ISO 24444-compliant test report with lab name, date, or result summary is publicly accessible to verify this figure.

Mentioned only

PA++++ (highest UVA protection category)Needs proof

PA++++ is a meaningful UVA protection claim that requires its own verified test; no publicly accessible UVA test report was found during research.

Mentioned only

Fragrance-FreePublicly supported

No Parfum, Fragrance, or identifiable scent-use essential oils appear in the published INCI list; this claim is confirmed.

Evidence visible

Coconut Water hydrationNeeds proof

Coconut Water appears well down the ingredient list, indicating a supporting rather than primary hydrating concentration despite the prominent product naming.

Mentioned only

Broad-spectrum sun protectionNeeds proof

The UV filter combination covers UVA and UVB by design, but no publicly accessible broad-spectrum test report with a UVAPF ratio is linked from the brand.

Mentioned only

What would strengthen this review

Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps

  • No ISO 24444-compliant SPF test report is publicly accessible. Publishing a report with lab name, test date, batch, and SPF result would allow the SPF 50 claim to be independently verified.
  • No UVA test report is publicly linked. PA++++ requires verified UVA testing; the methodology and result are not in the public domain.
  • UV filter concentrations are not disclosed. Knowing the percentage of each chemical filter would allow consumers and researchers to assess exposure levels relative to regulatory limits.
  • No photostability data is published. With Avobenzone present alongside two other chemical filters, photostability testing data would confirm the UV system holds up under sun exposure.
About this review

This assessment is based only on publicly available INCI, claims, and test evidence. It is not a full Clean Sheet certification. Full certification requires confidential formula review, exact concentrations, supplier documentation, manufacturing records, packaging compatibility, preservative efficacy, stability, and complete claim validation.

Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.

Independent reviewPublic evidence only
Full methodology
  • What global regulations say about each ingredient
  • What toxicology evidence shows at cosmetic concentrations
  • What formula concentration context changes
  • What the product format and leave-on contact time changes
  • What the stated user group needs
  • What published test evidence confirms
  • What the brand is claiming vs what evidence supports

More from Aqualogica

See all
Back to Aqualogica
WhatsApp Community

Join The Clean Sheet™ community

Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.

Join for free →