Hydrate+ Dewy Sunscreen SPF 50 PA++++
Aqualogica's flagship hydrating sunscreen uses a hybrid mineral-chemical UV filter system combining Titanium Dioxide, Zinc Oxide, Avobenzone, Octinoxate, and Benzophenone-3 for broad-spectrum SPF 50 PA++++ coverage. Two of those chemical filters carry regulatory concern: Benzophenone-3 (Oxybenzone) is classified as a Category 1 endocrine disruptor by ECHA (2025), and Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate (Octinoxate) had its EU-permitted maximum reduced in 2023 over hormonal concern data. Both remain permitted in India and are applied in a product used daily across significant skin surface area. The mineral filters, Ceramide 11, Hyaluronic Acid, and Trehalose add genuine barrier and hydration benefit, and the formula is fragrance-free.

- Daily Use
- Dry skin
- Skincare beginners
- Endocrine Disruptor Concern
- Relying on the SPF claim without independent evidence
₹279 · ₹6/ml • Analysed 10 June 2026
PA++++ is essential for India's UV conditions, where UVA-driven post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation is a leading skin concern across Fitzpatrick III-V skin tones. The hybrid formula avoids the white cast that has historically discouraged daily sunscreen use in India. However, consumers who prefer to avoid Benzophenone-3 (Oxybenzone) given its 2025 ECHA Category 1 endocrine disruptor classification should note its presence alongside Octinoxate in this daily-use product. Reapplication every two hours under direct sun exposure is needed to maintain the stated SPF. The dewy finish may feel heavy for oily skin during India's humid summers.
This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.
At a glance
What was checked
Good
What was checked
SPF 50 is stated on the product, but no ISO 24444-compliant test report with lab name, date, or result summary is publicly accessible to verify this figure.
PA++++ is a meaningful UVA protection claim that requires its own verified test; no publicly accessible UVA test report was found during research.
No Parfum, Fragrance, or identifiable scent-use essential oils appear in the published INCI list; this claim is confirmed.
Coconut Water appears well down the ingredient list, indicating a supporting rather than primary hydrating concentration despite the prominent product naming.
The UV filter combination covers UVA and UVB by design, but no publicly accessible broad-spectrum test report with a UVAPF ratio is linked from the brand.
The breakdown
Public Evidence Score across 5 pillars. Open any row for the full rationale.
Ingredient SafetyFair
Two UV filters in this formula carry hormonal disruption concerns based on public regulatory data.
Two UV filters in this formula carry hormonal disruption concerns based on public regulatory data. Benzophenone-3 (Oxybenzone) was classified as a Category 1 endocrine disruptor by ECHA in 2025, is under restriction review in the EU, and is banned in several marine-protected areas worldwide including Hawaii, Palau, and Aruba for documented coral reef toxicity. Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate (Octinoxate) is a separate UV filter whose permitted maximum in the EU was reduced in 2023 following updated endocrine disruption data. Having both in a daily-use leave-on product applied across large body surface areas is a meaningful stacking of hormonal-concern filters. Both are currently India-permitted. The mineral filters Titanium Dioxide and Zinc Oxide are inert and safe. No synthetic fragrance, no parabens, no formaldehyde releasers identified.
Formula LogicStrong
The hybrid UV filter system is coverage-effective: Titanium Dioxide handles UVB and short UVA, Zinc Oxide extends to long UVA, Avobenzone covers the full UVA spectrum, and...
The hybrid UV filter system is coverage-effective: Titanium Dioxide handles UVB and short UVA, Zinc Oxide extends to long UVA, Avobenzone covers the full UVA spectrum, and Octinoxate adds UVB absorption. No dedicated next-generation photostabiliser is present, but the mineral filters provide some photostabilising effect on Avobenzone. Ceramide 11 adds genuine barrier value that is uncommon in sunscreens. Hyaluronic Acid, Trehalose, Xylitol, and Sodium Lactate build a layered hydration system. Coconut Water appears well down the ingredient list, suggesting it is a supporting rather than a primary hydrating base despite the product name. Active UV filter concentrations are not publicly disclosed.
Claims EvidenceGood
SPF 50 and PA++++ are clearly stated on the product.
SPF 50 and PA++++ are clearly stated on the product. The full INCI list is published on the brand website. However, no ISO 24444-compliant SPF test report is publicly accessible, which means the SPF 50 figure cannot be independently verified from public data. Active UV filter concentrations are not disclosed. The Coconut Water-first product name implies a primary hydrating role that the ingredient list does not support. The Benzophenone-3 presence is not acknowledged in any product communication. Fragrance-free status is confirmed by INCI and is publicly supported.
Test TransparencyGrade CFair
The brand states SPF 50 and PA++++ prominently.
The brand states SPF 50 and PA++++ prominently. However, no ISO 24444-compliant SPF test report is publicly accessible. No lab name, test date, batch, or result summary is linked or published anywhere on the brand website or associated Unilever channels found during research. PA++++ is a meaningful UVA claim that also requires verified testing. Aqualogica is a Hindustan Unilever brand, and internal testing almost certainly exists, but it is not in the public domain. The absence of a published test report is the norm for this category in India, so this is assigned Grade C.
Consumer ClarityStrong
Clear application instructions are present, including the recommended amount and routine step.
Clear application instructions are present, including the recommended amount and routine step. Reapplication guidance for sun exposure is provided. Skin type suitability is stated. A warning about Oxybenzone for reef-conscious users is absent from product communications, which is a gap worth noting for informed consumer choice.
Ingredient list
Fair
Ingredient list
| Ingredient |
|---|
Aqua |
Titanium Dioxide |
Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate |
Butyl Methoxydibenzoylmethane |
Benzophenone-3 |
Phospholipids |
1,3 Butylene Glycol |
Sodium Polyacrylate |
Glycerin |
Zinc Oxide |
Xylitol |
Caprylic Acid |
Glyceryl Stearate |
Dimethicone |
Hyaluronic Acid |
Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil |
D-Alpha Tocopheryl Acetate |
Ceramide 11 |
Cocos Nucifera (Coconut) Water |
Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice |
Sodium Lactate |
Trehalose |
Sodium Benzoate |
E-Ascorbic Acid |
Sodium Levulinate |
Phenoxyethanol |
Allantoin |
Melanin |
INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).
Regulatory screen
Review
Regulatory screen
Potential concern found - Benzophenone-3 (Oxybenzone, EU Annex VI restricted, under endocrine disruptor review); Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate (Octinoxate, EU Annex VI max reduced 2023)
No obvious public red flag found
No obvious public red flag found
Potential concern found - Benzophenone-3 (Oxybenzone, FDA reviewing systemic absorption data)
Potential concern found - Benzophenone-3 (MFDS restricted UV filter); Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate (MFDS max 7.5%)
Potential concern found - Benzophenone-3 (Oxybenzone, ECHA Category 1 Endocrine Disruptor 2025)
No obvious carcinogenicity flag found
No obvious public red flag found
Potential concern found - SPF 50 claim requires TGA-compliant testing documentation if marketed in Australia
Not triggered
Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.
Claims checked
Good
Claims checked
SPF 50 is stated on the product, but no ISO 24444-compliant test report with lab name, date, or result summary is publicly accessible to verify this figure.
Mentioned only
PA++++ is a meaningful UVA protection claim that requires its own verified test; no publicly accessible UVA test report was found during research.
Mentioned only
No Parfum, Fragrance, or identifiable scent-use essential oils appear in the published INCI list; this claim is confirmed.
Evidence visible
Coconut Water appears well down the ingredient list, indicating a supporting rather than primary hydrating concentration despite the prominent product naming.
Mentioned only
The UV filter combination covers UVA and UVB by design, but no publicly accessible broad-spectrum test report with a UVAPF ratio is linked from the brand.
Mentioned only
What would strengthen this review
Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps
- ○No ISO 24444-compliant SPF test report is publicly accessible. Publishing a report with lab name, test date, batch, and SPF result would allow the SPF 50 claim to be independently verified.
- ○No UVA test report is publicly linked. PA++++ requires verified UVA testing; the methodology and result are not in the public domain.
- ○UV filter concentrations are not disclosed. Knowing the percentage of each chemical filter would allow consumers and researchers to assess exposure levels relative to regulatory limits.
- ○No photostability data is published. With Avobenzone present alongside two other chemical filters, photostability testing data would confirm the UV system holds up under sun exposure.
This assessment is based only on publicly available INCI, claims, and test evidence. It is not a full Clean Sheet certification. Full certification requires confidential formula review, exact concentrations, supplier documentation, manufacturing records, packaging compatibility, preservative efficacy, stability, and complete claim validation.
Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.
Full methodology
- What global regulations say about each ingredient
- What toxicology evidence shows at cosmetic concentrations
- What formula concentration context changes
- What the product format and leave-on contact time changes
- What the stated user group needs
- What published test evidence confirms
- What the brand is claiming vs what evidence supports