FOXTALEMoisturizers

Hydrating Moisturizer with Ceramide

A barrier-repair moisturiser featuring four ceramides (Ceramide 1, 2, 3, and 6 II) delivered in a skin-identical lipid matrix with cholesterol and fatty acids - this 3:1:1 (ceramide:cholesterol:fatty acid) molar ratio is the physiologically optimal ratio for intercellular lamellar body repair, based on published barrier research by Elias et al. The base is a silicone-heavy emulsion: Cyclopentasiloxane (D5) at position 2 is the dominant secondary ingredient. Hydrogenated Ethylhexyl Olivate and Hydrogenated Olive Oil Unsaponifiables (Olivem system) provide olive-derived emollient support. Sodium Polyacryloyldimethyl Taurate at position 20 creates the non-sticky, fast-absorbing texture. Contains Allergen Free Fragrance.

Hydrating Moisturizer with Ceramide
MOSTLYCLEAN
Mostly Clean
Best for
  • Dry skin
  • Daily Use
  • Post-Treatment Recovery

₹495 · ₹10/ml • Analysed 11 June 2026

India Context

Ceramide-based moisturisers are particularly effective for barrier repair after extended sun exposure, acid exfoliation, or retinol use - all common scenarios for Indian skin care routines. The silicone-dominant vehicle creates an occlusive film that is effective in air-conditioned environments (which strip skin moisture). In high-humidity coastal cities (Mumbai, Chennai), the heavier silicone base may feel rich - use sparingly and allow full absorption.

This is a web evidence review, not a Clean Sheet certification. We checked the ingredient list, publicly available test reports, marketing claims, and formula logic using only public information available at the time of review.

At a glance

Alcohol free
Paraben free

What was checked

Strong
3:1:1 Ceramide Barrier ComplexNeeds context

Ratio claim references published research but formula-specific concentrations are not disclosed - ratio cannot be independently verified.

Brand claim
24-hour hydrationNeeds context

Standard moisturiser claim; no published test data.

Brand claim
Non-sticky, fast-absorbingVerified

Verifiable from the silicone and polymer-based emulsion system.

Published evidence
Verified: confirmed from public evidenceSupported: consistent with available evidenceNeeds context: relevant for some usersNot verified: could not be confirmed

The breakdown

Mostly credible with gaps

Public Evidence Score across 5 pillars. Open any row for the full rationale.

Ingredient Safety
Strong

Four ceramides in a physiologically appropriate ratio with cholesterol and fatty acids is a well-established and safe approach.

Four ceramides in a physiologically appropriate ratio with cholesterol and fatty acids is a well-established and safe approach. No parabens, no SLS, no fragrance allergens. Cyclopentasiloxane (D5) at position 2 is the dominant secondary ingredient - the EU has restricted D5 below 0.1% in wash-off products due to aquatic persistence; leave-on restrictions are not yet in force, but D5's documented aquatic accumulation is an environmental concern. Allergen Free Fragrance (synthetic, not fragrance-free) is present. Disodium EDTA as chelator.

Formula Logic
Strong

The ceramide delivery system replicates the lamellar lipid structure of the stratum corneum: Ceramides 1, 2, 3, and 6 II alongside Hydrogenated Lecithin, Caprylic/Capric...

The ceramide delivery system replicates the lamellar lipid structure of the stratum corneum: Ceramides 1, 2, 3, and 6 II alongside Hydrogenated Lecithin, Caprylic/Capric Glycerides and Polyglyceryl-10 Esters in a 3:1:1 ceramide:cholesterol:fatty acid ratio. This ratio is published as optimal for barrier repair (Elias et al.). The silicone base (D5 + Dimethicone) creates a protective film. Ceramide and cholesterol concentrations are not individually disclosed, limiting independent verification of the ratio claim.

Claims Evidence
Strong

Good evidence for stated claims based on public information.

The 3:1:1 ceramide:cholesterol:fatty acid ratio claim is scientifically specific and educationally positive. Actual ceramide concentrations are not disclosed. '24-hour hydration' claim requires substantiation data, which has not been published. Allergen Free Fragrance not prominently disclosed. Four ceramide types are named.

Test Transparency
Grade CFair

No published clinical study for this formula.

No published clinical study for this formula. The ceramide ratio claim references published dermatology research (Elias et al.) rather than a product-specific trial. No hydration efficacy test certificate is publicly accessible.

Consumer Clarity
Good

The 3:1:1 ratio claim is educational and specific.

The 3:1:1 ratio claim is educational and specific. Individual ceramide concentrations are not disclosed. D5 cyclopentasiloxane's environmental concern is not communicated to consumers. Allergen Free Fragrance not explained as synthetic fragrance in consumer materials.

Ingredient list

Strong
SafeNoteCaution
Ingredient
Aqua
Cyclopentasiloxane
Dimethicone
Polysilicone-11
Butylene Glycol
Decyl Glucoside
Hydrogenated Ethylhexyl Olivate
Hydrogenated Olive Oil Unsaponifiables
Ceteareth-20
Glyceryl Stearate Citrate
Dicaprylyl Carbonate
Cetearyl Alcohol
Cetyl Palmitate
Sorbitan Palmitate
Sorbitan Oleate
C12-15 Alkyl Benzoate
Glycerin
Glyceryl Glucoside
Behenyl Alcohol
Sodium Polyacryloyldimethyl Taurate
Phenoxyethanol
Ethylhexylglycerin
Octenidine HCl
Ceramide 1
Ceramide 2
Ceramide 3
Ceramide 6 II
Butylene Glycol
Hydrogenated Lecithin
Caprylic/Capric Glycerides
Polyglyceryl-10 Esters
Pentylene Glycol
Polymethylsilsesquioxane
Sodium Hyaluronate Crosspolymer
Tocopherol
Disodium EDTA
Sodium Hydroxide
Allergen Free Fragrance

INCI order as declared on packaging. Position reflects approximate concentration (high to low).

Regulatory screen

Review
EU 1223/2009EU Cosmetics Regulation - Annexes II–VI

Cyclopentasiloxane (D5) restricted below 0.1% in wash-off products (Regulation EU 2018/1513); leave-on restriction not yet in force. No other flagged substances.

India CR 2020India Cosmetics Rules, CDSCO

No flagged substances

Health Canada HotlistCanada prohibited & restricted ingredients

No flagged substances

US FDA 21 CFRUS FDA Parts 700–740

No flagged substances

MFDS KoreaKorea Cosmetics Act

No flagged substances

ECHA SVHCSubstances of Very High Concern

No flagged substances

IARCCarcinogen classifications Groups 1/2A/2B

No flagged substances

AICIS AustraliaAustralian industrial chemical safety

No flagged substances

TGA AustraliaTherapeutic claims (if applicable)

No flagged substances

Canada NHPIDNatural health product ingredients

No flagged substances

Flags are based on publicly available INCI only. Not a substitute for full regulatory compliance review.

Claims checked

Strong
3:1:1 Ceramide Barrier ComplexNeeds proof

Ratio claim references published research but formula-specific concentrations are not disclosed - ratio cannot be independently verified.

Mentioned only

24-hour hydrationNeeds proof

Standard moisturiser claim; no published test data.

Mentioned only

Non-sticky, fast-absorbingPublicly supported

Verifiable from the silicone and polymer-based emulsion system.

Evidence visible

What would strengthen this review

Public evidence the brand could provide to close verification gaps

  • Individual ceramide concentrations not disclosed - 3:1:1 ratio claim cannot be independently verified
  • 24-hour hydration claim not substantiated with published data
  • D5 cyclopentasiloxane environmental concern not communicated to consumers
  • No published clinical study for this formula
About this review

A ceramide-based barrier repair moisturiser with sound formulation science. The 3:1:1 ceramide:cholesterol:fatty acid ratio is well-grounded in published barrier research. The D5 cyclopentasiloxane dominance is the primary environmental concern. Individual ceramide concentrations should be disclosed to substantiate the ratio claim.

Are you the brand? If you have published test data or want to request a re-review, write to us at hello@thecleansheet.in.

Independent reviewPublic evidence only
Full methodology
  • What global regulations say about each ingredient
  • What toxicology evidence shows at cosmetic concentrations
  • What formula concentration context changes
  • What the product format and leave-on contact time changes
  • What the stated user group needs
  • What published test evidence confirms
  • What the brand is claiming vs what evidence supports

More from Foxtale

See all
Back to Foxtale
WhatsApp Community

Join The Clean Sheet™ community

Science-backed beauty tips, ingredient alerts, and early access. Straight to your WhatsApp.

Join for free →